[sage-devel] Re: What's the real reason for

2009-10-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Simon King wrote: > > > On 7 Okt., 23:44, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: >> Thank you, I see the point of saving SAGE64 now. >> >> Does the same not apply to ALL other variables like CC, CXX, >> SAGE_FORTRAN .. etc too? I believe I have screwed up builds by mixing >> compilers. > > Wouldn't it make

[sage-devel] Re: What's the real reason for

2009-10-07 Thread Simon King
On 7 Okt., 23:44, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > Thank you, I see the point of saving SAGE64 now. > > Does the same not apply to ALL other variables like CC, CXX, > SAGE_FORTRAN .. etc too? I believe I have screwed up builds by mixing > compilers. Wouldn't it make sense to create a file that stor

[sage-devel] Re: What's the real reason for

2009-10-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Dr. David Kirkby > wrote: >> I can see the above file is called from sage-env, but I'm trying to work >> out exactly that the aim of it is. Do we really need the script at all? >> >> It seems to do 3 things. >> >> 1) If SAGE64 is yes, it pri

[sage-devel] Re: What's the real reason for local/bin/sage-check-64 ?

2009-10-07 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > I can see the above file is called from sage-env, but I'm trying to work > out exactly that the aim of it is. Do we really need the script at all? > > It seems to do 3 things. > > 1) If SAGE64 is yes, it prints we are building 64-bit on