[sage-devel] Re: Version of sage on sage.math on October 4th

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 10, 1:07 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Oct 9, 8:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/9/07, Iftikhar Burhanuddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, William Stein wrote: > > > > I think thememoryleaks that we identified

[sage-devel] Re: Version of sage on sage.math on October 4th

2007-10-09 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 9, 8:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/9/07, Iftikhar Burhanuddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, William Stein wrote: > > > I think the memory leaks that we identified before (which involve ntl > > > strings, etc.) > > > only *maybe* got f

[sage-devel] Re: Version of sage on sage.math on October 4th

2007-10-09 Thread William Stein
On 10/9/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/cf/cf.pyx > Total time for all tests: 1684.6 seconds > Delete that. We don't use cf.pyx anymore in Sage. I've deleted then one on sage.math. -- William --~--~-~--~~~-

[sage-devel] Re: Version of sage on sage.math on October 4th

2007-10-09 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: > > Fortunately any Sage install is very good at tracking its entire upgrade > history. On sage.math do this: > > cd /home/was/sage/spkg/installed > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage/spkg/installed$ ls -1l sage-* This is the record of my system wide installations on /usr/local/

[sage-devel] Re: Version of sage on sage.math on October 4th

2007-10-09 Thread William Stein
On 10/9/07, Iftikhar Burhanuddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, William Stein wrote: > > I think the memory leaks that we identified before (which involve ntl > > strings, etc.) > > only *maybe* got fixed in Sage-2.8.6, and certainly weren't fixed in > > sage-2.8.5.1, > > so if y