[sage-devel] Re: Using singular quotient ring for defining _singular_() object

2014-02-11 Thread kroeker
Hello, maybe an upstream feature request could help, too at http://www.singular.uni-kl.de:8002/trac/report/1?sort=ticket&asc=0&page=1 Jack Am Montag, 23. Januar 2012 10:32:57 UTC+1 schrieb syd.la...@gmail.com: > > In current version of sage you can not have a singular object for k(a) > [x] wh

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Using singular quotient ring for defining _singular_() object

2012-01-25 Thread William Stein
On Jan 25, 2012 9:33 PM, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com" wrote: > > So I guess everybody found this issue a non-issue. However, this for > example makes it possible to compute the genus of a function field > that is defined over a non-prime finite field > (genus currently uses singular) > > I take the si

[sage-devel] Re: Using singular quotient ring for defining _singular_() object

2012-01-25 Thread syd.lavas...@gmail.com
So I guess everybody found this issue a non-issue. However, this for example makes it possible to compute the genus of a function field that is defined over a non-prime finite field (genus currently uses singular) I take the silence as a 'go ahead'. I'll add this to the patch of http://trac.sagema