On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
>> Would it make more sense to include something like busybox
>> (www.busybox.net) into sage?
>
> I do not believe so.
[snip]
> Sage is designed to run on workstations and servers, not small embedded
> systems.
Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
> Would it make more sense to include something like busybox
> (www.busybox.net) into sage?
I do not believe so.
> Busybox includes a shell (ash, I think),
> and most shellutils and textutils one would probably want to use (this
> includes awk, sed, etc). Instead of try
Would it make more sense to include something like busybox
(www.busybox.net) into sage? Busybox includes a shell (ash, I think),
and most shellutils and textutils one would probably want to use (this
includes awk, sed, etc). Instead of trying to fix the sage shell
scripts to work in any combinati
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Learn more from my ticket at
>>
>> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7188
>
> I was attracted by the following comment of yours:
>
> {{{
> I've tested this on
>
> * AIX 6.1, compli
Hi David,
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Learn more from my ticket at
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7188
I was attracted by the following comment of yours:
{{{
I've tested this on
* AIX 6.1, compliments of http://www.metamodul.com/10.html
}}}
Th
