Okay, that’s reasonable. How about the attached, then?
Robin
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 at 10:43 John Cremona wrote:
> I think that an error should be raised if the projective point constructor
> is called with (0,0,0).
> On 29 Jul 2016 23:54, "Robin Houston" wrote:
>
> I think there’s another case t
I think that an error should be raised if the projective point constructor
is called with (0,0,0).
On 29 Jul 2016 23:54, "Robin Houston" wrote:
I think there’s another case that isn’t handled correctly, exemplified by:
R. = QQ[]
T = EllipticCurve_from_cubic(y^2*z - x^3 - z^3, (0,1,0))
A simple
I think there’s another case that isn’t handled correctly, exemplified by:
R. = QQ[]
T = EllipticCurve_from_cubic(y^2*z - x^3 - z^3, (0,1,0))
A simple change that fixes this problem is to make the projective_point()
method not blow up when given (0,0,0), e.g.:
*--- a/src/sage/schemes/elliptic
On 25 Jul 2016 17:03, "leif" wrote:
>
> Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> > On 2016-07-25 13:07, John Cremona wrote:
> >> Can someone make a trac ticket for this please?
> >
> > Done: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21092
>
> Ooops, race condition (I did look at the trac timeline!).
>
> On behalf of John (
Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-07-25 13:07, John Cremona wrote:
>> Can someone make a trac ticket for this please?
>
> Done: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21092
Ooops, race condition (I did look at the trac timeline!).
On behalf of John (Forgot your password?):
https://trac.sagemath.org/tic
