On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:29:07AM -0800, mhampton wrote:
>> On Jan 21, 1:03 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
>> > 500s is too long for a doctest to take with "sage -t -long",
>> > especially since on sage.math with a healthy number of threads,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:29:07AM -0800, mhampton wrote:
> On Jan 21, 1:03 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> > 500s is too long for a doctest to take with "sage -t -long",
> > especially since on sage.math with a healthy number of threads, this
> > one doctest will take as long as the rest of the librar
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:29 AM, mhampton wrote:
> Well then perhaps we should have a -very_long flag! I would think
> that some very long doctests stress-test things in a way that may be
> impossible with shorter tests - large memory usage for example.
>
> -Marshall
+1!
--
Robert L. Miller
Well then perhaps we should have a -very_long flag! I would think
that some very long doctests stress-test things in a way that may be
impossible with shorter tests - large memory usage for example.
-Marshall
On Jan 21, 1:03 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, mhampton
PS - sorry for shouting in the subject :)
On Jan 19, 1:54 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> It's time to point our fingers at long doctests again.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups
