[sage-devel] Re: Summary of issues on Solaris 10 (SPARC) for Sage 3.0.3.alpha1

2008-06-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On Jun 9, 9:23 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The R manual says R fails tests if built with gcc 4 (where 4.00 or 4.x > is not specified) on Solaris x86. I will try a build on Solaris x86 as > some time with both Forge and gcc, but not today. > > Dave The official source of R

[sage-devel] Re: Summary of issues on Solaris 10 (SPARC) for Sage 3.0.3.alpha1

2008-06-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On Jun 8, 11:05 pm, Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > 3) Next failure is polybori-0.3.1.p3 > > Michael suggested the change: > > > #!bin/sh" -> "#!/usr/bin/env bash" > > > but that does NOT work for me. Numerous errors still appear but they > > are in C++ code and I don

[sage-devel] Re: Summary of issues on Solaris 10 (SPARC) for Sage 3.0.3.alpha1

2008-06-08 Thread Alexander Dreyer
Hello, > 3) Next failure is polybori-0.3.1.p3 > Michael suggested the change: > > #!bin/sh" -> "#!/usr/bin/env bash" > > but that does NOT work for me. Numerous errors still appear but they > are in C++ code and I don't know C++. I hope someone else can fix that > one. (I will give access to one

[sage-devel] Re: Summary of issues on Solaris 10 (SPARC) for Sage 3.0.3.alpha1

2008-06-08 Thread mabshoff
On Jun 8, 1:55 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Dave, > I've posted quite a few things here recently on my attempts to build > Sage on Solaris. Here's my summary of the current issues in building > SAGE 3.0.3.alpha1 under Solaris 10, listed in order of the failures. > > My