[sage-devel] Re: State of sage built with clang/clang++ on OS X - update

2016-10-03 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 10:33:38 PM UTC+2, François wrote: > > this is the status after about two weeks > ratpoints compiles for you? On Linux with CC=clang CXX=clang++ make (clang-3.7.0) I can't get past ratpoints. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

[sage-devel] Re: State of sage built with clang/clang++ on OS X - update

2016-10-02 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
> > symmetrica > > Someone volunteered for the trivial fix of changing > "return;" to "return 0;" in a few places at #12439... > > That would be me, and I had less time than I thought I would this past week. I am working on it now. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you a

[sage-devel] Re: State of sage built with clang/clang++ on OS X

2016-09-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 9:21:34 PM UTC, François wrote: > > So on another thread there was talk about whether we could > build sage with clang+gfortran on OS X. > Well it is not that bad and a little push in the right place would > probably > get use 95% there. > > I couldn’t buil