On Sat, 19 Aug 2017, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
It would be nice to have the most relevant ones first and not just
alphabetical.
Define "relevant."
Well, instead of "relevant" we could define "basic"- or "beginner"-index
for a function, say an integer from 1 to 100. 1-10 would mean something
Define "relevant." Some do not work because of old code that needs to be
lifted up to the appropriate category code. However, what might be less
useful for you might be useful for someone else. In my mind, alphabetical
is the best way to go because it makes it the easiest to find things.
Best,
As e.g. SymPy has the same problem one might look if it already was
addressed in other software using IPython.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sag
