[sage-devel] Re: Some sparse matrices cleanup and question on parallelism

2017-10-30 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
> > > Onto some paraellization questions, as I can take advantage of multiple > cores. Does anyone know of a good parallel linear algebra library we could > include in Sage (hopefully it would work with my field)? How difficult is > it to parallelize Cython code? At least in the classical echel

[sage-devel] Re: Some sparse matrices cleanup and question on parallelism

2017-10-30 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
On Monday, October 30, 2017 at 5:47:10 PM UTC+10, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Travis, > > On 2017-10-30, Travis Scrimshaw > wrote: > > My first question is that the method _strassen_default_echelon_cutoff > seems > > to return -1 and never be overwritten. This means that by default, the > > ech

[sage-devel] Re: Some sparse matrices cleanup and question on parallelism

2017-10-30 Thread Simon King
Hi Travis, On 2017-10-30, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > My first question is that the method _strassen_default_echelon_cutoff seems > to return -1 and never be overwritten. This means that by default, the > echelonize will always use the classical in-place, making having a default > algorithm that