John Cremona wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Dr. David Kirkby :
>> John Cremona wrote:
>>> If by "this code" you mean paripriv.h then that belongs to pari, i.e.
>>> is upstream. But sage/ext/fast_callable.c will have been written by
>>> someone who subscribes to this list, I hope!
>>>
>>> John
>> But the buil
2009/7/22 Dr. David Kirkby :
>
> John Cremona wrote:
>> If by "this code" you mean paripriv.h then that belongs to pari, i.e.
>> is upstream. But sage/ext/fast_callable.c will have been written by
>> someone who subscribes to this list, I hope!
>>
>> John
>
> But the build of pari works fine, inc
John Cremona wrote:
> If by "this code" you mean paripriv.h then that belongs to pari, i.e.
> is upstream. But sage/ext/fast_callable.c will have been written by
> someone who subscribes to this list, I hope!
>
> John
But the build of pari works fine, including the lines in paripriv.h. If
the
If by "this code" you mean paripriv.h then that belongs to pari, i.e.
is upstream. But sage/ext/fast_callable.c will have been written by
someone who subscribes to this list, I hope!
John
2009/7/22 Dr. David Kirkby :
>
> John Cremona wrote:
>
>> Line 428 defines an enum struct which is only rel
John Cremona wrote:
> Line 428 defines an enum struct which is only relevant for gp.
> The
> earlier two have no numeric constants that I can see but the function
> prototypes have variables in upper case, and it's possible that these
> are macros which are getting expanded into numbers.
>
> J
Line 428 defines an enum struct which is only relevant for gp. The
earlier two have no numeric constants that I can see but the function
prototypes have variables in upper case, and it's possible that these
are macros which are getting expanded into numbers.
John
2009/7/22 Dr. David Kirkby :
>
