On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 11:38 AM Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le 28/12/2018 à 15:32, E. Madison Bray a écrit :
> > Also worth noting: My plan (I had hoped to do this sooner but don't
> > have time) in the near term is to rip out most of sage.libs.gap and
> > rewrite it a
Le 28/12/2018 à 15:32, E. Madison Bray a écrit :
Also worth noting: My plan (I had hoped to do this sooner but don't
have time) in the near term is to rip out most of sage.libs.gap and
rewrite it as a stand-alone Python interface to GAP, somewhat in the
vein of cypari(2). As it is, not a whole l
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 3:26 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:25 AM Simon King wrote:
> >
> > Hi Timo.
> >
> > On 2018-12-25, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
> > > I don't really see a reason to rename it. The old name doesn't suggest
> > > that
> > > it is implemented with pexpect.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:25 AM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Timo.
>
> On 2018-12-25, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
> > I don't really see a reason to rename it. The old name doesn't suggest that
> > it is implemented with pexpect.
>
> No, it does, by tradiation:
> AFAIK, *ALL* interfaces that are named after
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 3:00:30 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> if you count ECL in, the interface with it is not pexpect, yet it is
> called ecl, not libecl.
>
I would argue ECL is not an "interface" at all (and indeed, it's not in
sage.interfaces but in sage.libs). It's missing
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:17 AM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2018-12-26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >> 1. Creating examples in the doc strings. Reason: I simply don't know
> >>how to express the GAP command
> >> Group( [ (1,2)(3,8)(4,6)(5,7), (1,3)(2,5)(4,7)(6,8) ] )
> >>in l
Hi Dima,
On 2018-12-26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> 1. Creating examples in the doc strings. Reason: I simply don't know
>>how to express the GAP command
>> Group( [ (1,2)(3,8)(4,6)(5,7), (1,3)(2,5)(4,7)(6,8) ] )
>>in libgap. I tried
>>libgap.Group( [ ((1,2),(3,8),(4,6),(5,7)), ((1
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 10:31 PM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2018-12-26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > E.g. do not do
> >
> > G = libgap('DihedralGroup(8)')
> >
> > instead do
> >
> > G = libgap.DihedralGroup(8)
>
> Sure, that's what I do. I also used to do gap.DihedralGroup(8), which works
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:40 PM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2018-12-26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>> No, it does, by tradiation:
> >>> AFAIK, *ALL* interfaces that are named after a third-party computer
> >>> algebra
> >
> > if you count ECL in, the interface with it is not p
Hi Dima,
On 2018-12-26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> E.g. do not do
>
> G = libgap('DihedralGroup(8)')
>
> instead do
>
> G = libgap.DihedralGroup(8)
Sure, that's what I do. I also used to do gap.DihedralGroup(8), which works
just as well. I just chose an example to point out that the two call method
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:40 PM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2018-12-26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>> No, it does, by tradiation:
> >>> AFAIK, *ALL* interfaces that are named after a third-party computer
> >>> algebra
> >
> > if you count ECL in, the interface with it is not pexpect, yet
Hi Dima,
On 2018-12-26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>> No, it does, by tradiation:
>>> AFAIK, *ALL* interfaces that are named after a third-party computer algebra
>
> if you count ECL in, the interface with it is not pexpect, yet it is
> called ecl, not libecl.
Right. I wasn't aware of ecl.
>> proje
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 6:26 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2018 01:25:59 UTC+1 schrieb Simon King:
>>
>> Hi Timo.
>>
>> On 2018-12-25, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>> > I don't really see a reason to rename it. The old name doesn't suggest that
>> > it is implemented with pexpect.
Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2018 01:25:59 UTC+1 schrieb Simon King:
>
> Hi Timo.
>
> On 2018-12-25, Timo Kaufmann > wrote:
> > I don't really see a reason to rename it. The old name doesn't suggest
> that
> > it is implemented with pexpect.
>
> No, it does, by tradiation:
> AFAIK, *ALL* interfa
Hi Timo.
On 2018-12-25, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
> I don't really see a reason to rename it. The old name doesn't suggest that
> it is implemented with pexpect.
No, it does, by tradiation:
AFAIK, *ALL* interfaces that are named after a third-party computer algebra
projects (gap, singular, r, pari,
15 matches
Mail list logo
