On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> I think the right thing to do in this case is to carefully understand
>> the intention of the license (possibly consult with a lawyer), and
>> also to possibly write a letter to the OE
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
> I think the right thing to do in this case is to carefully understand
> the intention of the license (possibly consult with a lawyer), and
> also to possibly write a letter to the OEIS foundation with a petition
> for them to reconsider their
On Nov 26, 5:53 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Robert Dodier
> wrote:
> > Now one might suppose that the DLMF is a work of a federal
> > agency (NIST) and therefore cannot be copyrighted.
> > The arrangement is this: NIST contracts with the authors
> > (not NIST emp
On Nov 26, 4:53 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Robert Dodier
> wrote:
> > On Nov 25, 5:02 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> >> On Nov 25, 3:35 pm, Donald Alan Morrison
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > "Abramowitz and Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions" is another
> >> > interesti
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On Nov 25, 5:02 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
>> On Nov 25, 3:35 pm, Donald Alan Morrison
>> wrote:
>>
>> > "Abramowitz and Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions" is another
>> > interesting topic source you mentioned. It is very nice that it
On Nov 25, 5:02 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> On Nov 25, 3:35 pm, Donald Alan Morrison
> wrote:
>
> > "Abramowitz and Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions" is another
> > interesting topic source you mentioned. It is very nice that it's
> > free to view. I'm surprised that it's just scanned ima
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:11 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 26 November 2010 01:56, Donald Alan Morrison
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A1: If the license says you can't or the stripped version is no longer
>>> available, that's not an option.
>>
>>> -Don
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:11 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 26 November 2010 01:56, Donald Alan Morrison wrote:
>
>> A1: If the license says you can't or the stripped version is no longer
>> available, that's not an option.
>
>> -Don
>
> That would be true if the license was legally enforceable, wh
Surely they are about to sign an exclusive deal with Apple to have all
its
http://oeis.org/play
content available via iTunes Store...
On Nov 26, 12:11 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 26 November 2010 01:56, Donald Alan Morrison wrote:
>
> > A1: If the license says you can't or the stripped version
On 26 November 2010 01:56, Donald Alan Morrison wrote:
> A1: If the license says you can't or the stripped version is no longer
> available, that's not an option.
> -Don
That would be true if the license was legally enforceable, which I
very much doubt it is.
Dave
--
To post to this group, s
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Donald Alan Morrison
wrote:
> On Nov 25, 5:24 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
>> Two technical solutions:
>>
>> 1) have 'make' download the database.
>> 2) Before we make each release, dump a few gigabytes onto the OEIS
>> wiki, such that what we distribute is well under 5
On Nov 25, 5:24 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
> Two technical solutions:
>
> 1) have 'make' download the database.
> 2) Before we make each release, dump a few gigabytes onto the OEIS
> wiki, such that what we distribute is well under 5% of their
> "aggregate content". (tongue firmly in cheek)
Tom: Not
On Nov 25, 5:19 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>[...]
> (b) Even if he does own copyright (and I'm not saying he does), since it is
> free data and no one makes any money from it, if someone did redistribute the
> data which is already freely available, how can he prove that any
> damage occurred?
>[..
On Nov 25, 4:02 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> On Nov 25, 3:35 pm, Donald Alan Morrison
> wrote:
>
> > "Abramowitz and Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions" is another
> > interesting topic source you mentioned. It is very nice that it's
> > free to view. I'm surprised that it's just scanned ima
On Nov 25, 3:35 pm, Donald Alan Morrison
wrote:
> "Abramowitz and Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions" is another
> interesting topic source you mentioned. It is very nice that it's
> free to view. I'm surprised that it's just scanned imagessomeone
> could have run it through OCR, the
On Nov 25, 12:15 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:43 AM, ulfarsson wrote:
> >> the function sloane_find seems to be broken after the recent updates
> >> to The online encyclopedia of integer sequences, oies.org. For e
On Nov 25, 7:43 am, ulfarsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the function sloane_find seems to be broken after the recent updates
> to The online encyclopedia of integer sequences, oies.org. For example
>
> sloane_find([1,2,3,4,5,6])
>
> does not find anything in the database. The oies has also taken down
> t
17 matches
Mail list logo
