Jason Grout wrote:
> Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>> Sorry, if this is too much detail. The non-static case is still just
>> conjecture, but it should be easier to implement with your insight below.
> Wow, your ideas are fantastic. I'm really glad we have someone as
> capable as you working on this.
Th
Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>>> The immediate context, at least for me, is automatically generating
>>> images in the documentation (#6847, nothing yet). Currently, this uses
>>> a modified version of a matplotlib Sphinx directive with a new comment
>>> modifie
Jason Grout wrote:
> Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>> The immediate context, at least for me, is automatically generating
>> images in the documentation (#6847, nothing yet). Currently, this uses
>> a modified version of a matplotlib Sphinx directive with a new comment
>> modifier, e.g.
>>
>> .. plot::
>>
Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> If I execute
>
> sage: circle((0,0), 3, rgbcolor=(0.8,0,0.7), aspect_ratio=1)
>
> or
>
> sage: a = circle((0,0), 3, rgbcolor=(0.8,0,0.7), aspect_ratio=1)
>
> followed by one of
>
> sage: a
> sage: a.show()
>
> I see a circle with aspect ratio 1. But if I run
>
> sage:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
> If I execute
>
> sage: circle((0,0), 3, rgbcolor=(0.8,0,0.7), aspect_ratio=1)
>
> or
>
> sage: a = circle((0,0), 3, rgbcolor=(0.8,0,0.7), aspect_ratio=1)
>
> followed by one of
>
> sage: a
> sage: a.show()
>
> I see a circle with aspect rat
Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> ':no-source:,' that affect an entire block.) Backstage, Sphinx
> generates and runs, e.g.,
> [...]
> What if we added a "display=None" flag? It it's set, show() makes no
> images but updates and *returns* a Graphics object? Neither change is
> essential, but they would sim
