Hi Paul,
Le lundi 16 janvier 2017 01:33:17 UTC+1, Paul Masson a écrit :
>
> Eric, it seems to me that this is now an area in which SageMath is ahead
> of Mathematica,
>
For me, being open-source and based on Python, Sage was always ahead of
Mathematica :-)
More seriously, this may be true for
Eric, it seems to me that this is now an area in which SageMath is ahead of
Mathematica, and you are to be congratulated for that. Given that Wolfram
is a physicist, I've never understood why there is no native support in
Mathematica for general relativity calculations.
Have you considered addi
Le dimanche 15 janvier 2017 23:10:33 UTC+1, William a écrit :
>
> Kind of like publishing and important and foundational research paper...?
>
More kind of like writing a book ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe fro
Kind of like publishing and important and foundational research paper...?
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 1:49 PM Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
> Le dimanche 15 janvier 2017 21:24:37 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit :
>
> You managed to develop SageManifolds separately from Sage, and then to
> integrate the code ful
Le dimanche 15 janvier 2017 21:24:37 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit :
>
> You managed to develop SageManifolds separately from Sage, and then to
> integrate the code fully with Sage. I am curious how this is done. It looks
> daunting to me to chop out big code to small patches for gradual merge,
> w
You managed to develop SageManifolds separately from Sage, and then to
integrate the code fully with Sage. I am curious how this is done. It looks
daunting to me to chop out big code to small patches for gradual merge,
without breaking Sage.
Current Sage development workflow forces an author o
