On 3/2/12 11:31 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
Hi
On 2 March 2012 09:03, Robert Bradshaw mailto:rober...@math.washington.edu>> wrote:
Sage is as secure as bash (+ compilers). If you want to run arbitrary
bash scripts, let other people run their bash scripts, or set up a web
interface for
On 03/01/2012 10:39 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-03-01 13:35, Jason Grout wrote:
Can you elaborate, Jeroen, just so that communication is clear by what
you mean by "totally insecure"?
1) A user on a public Notebook server can run totally arbitrary
commands, including for example sending sp
Hi
On 1 March 2012 16:39, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-03-01 13:35, Jason Grout wrote:
> > Can you elaborate, Jeroen, just so that communication is clear by what
> > you mean by "totally insecure"?
> 1) A user on a public Notebook server can run totally arbitrary
> commands, including for exa
On 2012-03-01 13:35, Jason Grout wrote:
> Can you elaborate, Jeroen, just so that communication is clear by what
> you mean by "totally insecure"?
1) A user on a public Notebook server can run totally arbitrary
commands, including for example sending spam emails or using all system
resources.
2) T
Jason Grout writes:
> On 3/1/12 4:19 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> On 2012-02-29 22:56, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>>> Sage now has to watch the security updates for each component.
>> Sage is totally insecure and watching security updates isn't going to
>> solve this problem.
>>
>
> Can you elaborate,
On 3/1/12 4:19 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-02-29 22:56, Jan Groenewald wrote:
Sage now has to watch the security updates for each component.
Sage is totally insecure and watching security updates isn't going to
solve this problem.
Can you elaborate, Jeroen, just so that communication i
