[sage-devel] Re: Sage equivalents for Maple number theory functions

2007-11-30 Thread William Stein
On Nov 30, 2007 11:15 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 30, 2007, at 10:19 AM, William Stein wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2007 9:50 AM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Excellent list! Maybe I should take a break from p-adics and do > >> some of > >> these. Some of the ga

[sage-devel] Re: Sage equivalents for Maple number theory functions

2007-11-30 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Nov 30, 2007, at 10:19 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Nov 30, 2007 9:50 AM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Excellent list! Maybe I should take a break from p-adics and do >> some of >> these. Some of the gaps should be quite easy to fill in. I agree. Thanks for this list! > There

[sage-devel] Re: Sage equivalents for Maple number theory functions

2007-11-30 Thread William Stein
On Nov 30, 2007 10:19 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 30, 2007 9:50 AM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Excellent list! Maybe I should take a break from p-adics and do some of > > these. Some of the gaps should be quite easy to fill in. > > Please do not just blanke

[sage-devel] Re: Sage equivalents for Maple number theory functions

2007-11-30 Thread William Stein
On Nov 30, 2007 9:50 AM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Excellent list! Maybe I should take a break from p-adics and do some of > these. Some of the gaps should be quite easy to fill in. Please do not just blanket add all these without thought. For example, the first one I glanced at wa

[sage-devel] Re: Sage equivalents for Maple number theory functions

2007-11-30 Thread David Roe
Excellent list! Maybe I should take a break from p-adics and do some of these. Some of the gaps should be quite easy to fill in. David On Nov 30, 2007 12:45 PM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I've lurked on this list for a time, commenting little because I am > no