On Jun 21, 2010, at 8:34 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> Okay, I created a simple application (none of the copyright is set for
>> example) that does the following:
>>
>> 1. On launch it runs sage -notebook (which will open the default browser
>> etc. (unless there is a server running))
>
> This would b
> Okay, I created a simple application (none of the copyright is set for
> example) that does the following:
>
> 1. On launch it runs sage -notebook (which will open the default browser etc.
> (unless there is a server running))
This would be if one had it in (say) /Applications and double-cli
On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:08 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
>>> On 10 Jun., 02:37, Jason Grout wrote:
Karl-Dieter just showed me how to get the OSX App built using sage
-bdist:
> Honestly I can't see much use for a or b, especially since if you want
> to use the command line, you probably don't need us to hold your hand,
> and you probably aren't using Terminal.app anyway.
>
Definitely using Terminal.app :) But your main point is right.
>
> I think there was some talk
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
> I don't think that's actually the case. If the disk image we
> distribute is HFS+ it should allow us to hard link directories so that
> each application can have it's own copy of the sage directory, without
> any real duplication (and we c
On 6/10/10, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 Jun., 02:37, Jason Grout wrote:
Karl-Dieter just showed me how to get the OSX App built using sage
-bdist:
expo
On 6/10/10 11:08 AM, William Stein wrote:
Many of us use OS X, so let's just assume we can program anything if
we want. What would be the best UI for Sage?
The first thing that pops into my mind is that Sage runs as some sort
of server, kind of like say DropBox or any of the many other programs
> > There are people I know that would *love* to have a clickable app on
> > OSX. Why do we not have this as a download option on the webpage?
>
> As far as I remember, there was no consensus reached as to *what
> exactly* should happen if you "just click" on some Sage App Icon. As
Correct.
> o
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
>
>> On 10 Jun., 02:37, Jason Grout wrote:
>>>
>>> Karl-Dieter just showed me how to get the OSX App built using sage
>>> -bdist:
>>>
>>> export SAGE_APP_BUNDLE=yes
>>> sage -bdist 4.4.2-a
On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
On 10 Jun., 02:37, Jason Grout wrote:
Karl-Dieter just showed me how to get the OSX App built using sage -
bdist:
export SAGE_APP_BUNDLE=yes
sage -bdist 4.4.2-app
There are people I know that would *love* to have a clickable app on
OSX. Wh
Another option that I use is a simple clickable applescript/automator
task that opens a terminal, runs ./sage -notebook. I'm primarily
working on notebook development and making sure things work for the
server I use in my class, so don't directly use the command line. I
can make this little scrip
On 10 Jun., 02:37, Jason Grout wrote:
> Karl-Dieter just showed me how to get the OSX App built using sage -bdist:
>
> export SAGE_APP_BUNDLE=yes
> sage -bdist 4.4.2-app
>
> There are people I know that would *love* to have a clickable app on
> OSX. Why do we not have this as a download option
12 matches
Mail list logo
