OSX 10.6.2 on Intel with Xcode 3.21:
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/a_tour_of_sage/index.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/introduction.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/d
On Ubuntu 9.04 amd64, all tests for 4.3.alpha0 pass except the maxima test. On
Ubuntu 9.10 amd64, all tests pass except the maxima test and cell.py:
$ ./sage -t devel/sage/sage/server/notebook/cell.py
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/server/notebook/cell.py"
**
On 22 lis, 22:38, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Upgrading from 4.2.1 on Fedora 11, 32 bit I had the known issue with
> interfaces/maxima.py
This was my patch. I am very sorry for this and do not understand, why
all tests passed on my computer when I tested this patch. Now I have
the same issue.
Robert
-
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sage 4.3.alpha0 is out! Sage 4.3 now contains much of the new
> categories code from the sage-combinat team! It's been in development
> for quite awhile, and it's great to finally get it in. There is one
> known failure in sage/interfaces/maxima.py caused by
2009/11/22 ma...@mendelu.cz :
>
>
> On 22 lis, 18:05, John Cremona wrote:
>> I built 4.3.alpha0 fine on two linux machines (32 and 64 bit) but on
>> both I get one failure:
>>
>> The following tests failed:
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py"
>>
>> Details below.
>>
>
> This
On 22 lis, 18:05, John Cremona wrote:
> I built 4.3.alpha0 fine on two linux machines (32 and 64 bit) but on
> both I get one failure:
>
> The following tests failed:
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py"
>
> Details below.
>
This has been explained in the first message whic
I built 4.3.alpha0 fine on two linux machines (32 and 64 bit) but on
both I get one failure:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py"
Details below.
John
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py"
**
On Nov 22, 1:13 am, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello !! :-)
>
> The same happened to this one :http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6813
>
> I first thought because it was not just a patch, but added a new file
> somewhere, though it now seems to be a wrong hypothesis :-)
>
> Nathann
My guess
Hello !! :-)
The same happened to this one :
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6813
I first thought because it was not just a patch, but added a new file
somewhere, though it now seems to be a wrong hypothesis :-)
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegrou
Thanks Mike
I wonder how tickets with positive review are merged into Sage. The
following two have positive review and were not included. Is something
wrong with the patches? Or should the tickets simply wait for
inclusion?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7325
http://trac.sagemath.org/sa
10 matches
Mail list logo
