On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> Adding a couple calls like:
>
> register_unpickle_override('sage.categories.category', 'Sets', Sets)
>
> did the trick (thanks Carl!). By the way, where in the Sage source
> tree should I put those?
Well, obviously we don't have
Dear Craig, David, Mike, Robert:
Good news: I had not look at the unpickling issues outside of the
combinatorics code, thinking they would be similar to those in there,
that is fairly easy to handle. They actually turned out to be all
completely trivial: it's just that the basic categorie
Dear Craig, David, Mike, Robert:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:01:47AM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> I'll also give it a shot at the getattr alternative implementation
> (as we had discussed), so that you can focus on reviewing.
Done for the second one: see categories-getattr_hack-nt.patch
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 06:19:35PM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> Dear Craig, David, Mike, Robert:
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:01:47AM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> > I'll also give it a shot at the getattr alternative implementation
> > (as we had discussed), so that you can focus on r
Dear Craig, David, Mike, Robert:
Thanks for this week of intensive work together!
In the plane, I'll be working on updating the names of the categories
(AbelianGroups -> CommutativeAdditiveGroup, ...). I'll also give it a
shot at the getattr alternative implementation (as we had discusse
> I am up and running, fresh and full of energy and hope. And I have a
> bold plan for getting the core of the category patch in by tomorrow,
> and the rest in 10 days.
Oh and I forgot the most important part of the plan: once the core is
in Sage, we should all go sea kayaking to rejoice about it
On May 20, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
>> I won't be there by 3:00, but later this afternoon would be good.
>
> Sounds good; I did not get food yet, and this is becoming urgent. Just
> setup a time, and I'll be there!
I haven't eaten yet either, will head down to the SCC at 3:20
On May 20, 3:00 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> > I won't be there by 3:00, but later this afternoon would be good.
>
> Sounds good; I did not get food yet, and this is becoming urgent. Just
> setup a time, and I'll be there!
>
> > I would like to build this on top of a nearly-complete 4.0 to
> I won't be there by 3:00, but later this afternoon would be good.
Sounds good; I did not get food yet, and this is becoming urgent. Just
setup a time, and I'll be there!
> I would like to build this on top of a nearly-complete 4.0 to do some
> real testing and not have to do any more rebasin
On May 20, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Dear Sage / Sage-Combinat developers,
>
> I am up and running, fresh and full of energy and hope. And I have a
> bold plan for getting the core of the category patch in by tomorrow,
> and the rest in 10 days.
>
> Carl, Craig, David,
Dear Sage / Sage-Combinat developers,
I am up and running, fresh and full of energy and hope. And I have a
bold plan for getting the core of the category patch in by tomorrow,
and the rest in 10 days.
Carl, Craig, David, Mike, Robert (B): what about meeting at 3pm to
build a consensus ar
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:24:31PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> > > But please: *keep me updated about any such change as soon as
> > > possible* so as to limit conflicts. Every late conflict resolution
> > > just delays even further the final merge.
> >
> > Seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticke
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:12:00PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 25, 8:39 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
> > Before posting the patch to trac, I'll split it up into:
> >
> > - patch with all trivial import updates (the most invasive one)
> > - main patch with the category framework (with updates to
On Apr 30, 1:37 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
>
> wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:50:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> >> Just for the record, I hate when there is a looming patch over
> >> months of time whose main impact o
On Apr 25, 8:39 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
> Before posting the patch to trac, I'll split it up into:
>
> - patch with all trivial import updates (the most invasive one)
> - main patch with the category framework (with updates to
> parents/morphism/...)
> and the categ
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:50:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> Just for the record, I hate when there is a looming patch over
>> months of time whose main impact on Sage is to keep the rest of Sage
>> from improving in quality. F
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:50:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> Just for the record, I hate when there is a looming patch over
> months of time whose main impact on Sage is to keep the rest of Sage
> from improving in quality. For example, with Bill Furnish working on
> symoblic for months, the
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
>> At this stage I do believe you might have a hard time getting this
>> into 4.0 given the time frame and the ToDo list, but we will see what
>> happens :)
>
> I let you pickup the best option.
>
>> Aren't there major design issues like
> At this stage I do believe you might have a hard time getting this
> into 4.0 given the time frame and the ToDo list, but we will see what
> happens :)
I let you pickup the best option.
> Aren't there major design issues like dynamic classes to be
> discussed first? You mentioned a design docu
On Apr 25, 12:13 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:24:38PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
> I really would want to get the category code in Sage soon (4.0???):
At this stage I do believe you might have a hard time getting this
into 4.0 given the time frame and
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:24:38PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> while there should be a quick 3.4.2 to mop up patches from trac before
> the big 4.0 jump today we had a planning session during the UW status
> meeting about the goals for Sage 4.0. The result is at
>
>http://wiki.sagemath.org/plan/
21 matches
Mail list logo
