On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:57:27AM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> > > Info like this should not go into trac, but on a wiki page. If you
> > > want to see what has changed between revisions on trac it is
> > > tedious at best.
By popular demand, this is now:
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/wiki/Categori
On May 15, 2:47 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On May 14, 2009, at 11:28 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Info like this should not go into trac, but on a wiki page. If you
> > want to see what has changed between revisions on the wiki it is
> > tedious at best.
I obviously meant trac being tedious.
On May 14, 2009, at 11:28 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On May 14, 3:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On May 14, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I am trying to keep the patch description on trac up-to-date
>>> (from the
>>> description in the patch itself):
>>
>>>http://sag
On May 14, 2:00 pm, David Roe wrote:
> I've taken a look at most of these. I'll send Nicolas comments off list
> (though I probably won't get to that until later tonight). But I agree with
> Robert that a global picture wiki page would be good.
> David
Please keep review comments on list or
On May 14, 3:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On May 14, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > I am trying to keep the patch description on trac up-to-date (from the
> > description in the patch itself):
>
> > http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5891
>
> > Suggestions for improve
On May 14, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Hi Robert!
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:25:35PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> ...
>> I am looking forward to talking to you next week about all this
>> stuff, but I was thinking it would be useful to have a wiki page
>> summariz
Hi Robert!
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:25:35PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> ...
> I am looking forward to talking to you next week about all this
> stuff, but I was thinking it would be useful to have a wiki page
> summarizing the "big picture" with the links to relevant tickets, or
I've taken a look at most of these. I'll send Nicolas comments off list
(though I probably won't get to that until later tonight). But I agree with
Robert that a global picture wiki page would be good.
David
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
On May 8, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 12:55:57AM -0700, davidloeffler wrote:
>> Can I use this opportunity to request some reviews for modular forms
>> patches?
>
> Let me do the same for the prerequisite patches for the category
> framework. They are al
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 12:55:57AM -0700, davidloeffler wrote:
> Can I use this opportunity to request some reviews for modular forms
> patches?
Let me do the same for the prerequisite patches for the category
framework. They are all in trac now. Having them (or most of them) in
Sage would defini
One more thing: I have updated http://wiki.sagemath.org/plan/sage-4.0
in the wiki with most of the info here, but it might be a good idea
to
(a) keep it current as things develop
(b) add all missing info about projects, i.e. who is working on
coverage, etc
(c) clean it up in general
Signing o
I spend some time tonight on the gcc 4.4.0 porting problem and there
is only little work left to be done: I had resolved all issues in Sage
3.1.2, but neglected to merge all the fixed into subsequent releases.
Issues from 3.1.2 (3.4.2):
* gmp (gone in MPIR)
* ntl (Fixed in ntl-5.4.2.p7.spkg, n
On May 7, 12:55 am, davidloeffler wrote:
> Can I use this opportunity to request some reviews for modular forms
> patches? I decided I'd spend a few afternoons squashing as many easy
> modular forms buglets as I could, with the result that there is now a
> bunch of tickets that are "[with patch
On May 7, 1:11 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> > Mon May 11: fix fallout; malb fix os x libsingular (?)
>
> > Tue May 12: sage-4.0.rc1.tar
>
> > Wed May 13:
>
> > Thu May 14: sage-4.0.final.tar
>
> > Fri May 15: Release sage-4.0.tar.
>
> Well, my plan was to update Singular to 3.1 and P
> Mon May 11: fix fallout;malb fix os x libsingular (?)
>
> Tue May 12: sage-4.0.rc1.tar
>
> Wed May 13:
>
> Thu May 14: sage-4.0.final.tar
>
> Fri May 15: Release sage-4.0.tar.
Well, my plan was to update Singular to 3.1 and PolyBoRi to 0.6 during the
week mentioned above and I was
Can I use this opportunity to request some reviews for modular forms
patches? I decided I'd spend a few afternoons squashing as many easy
modular forms buglets as I could, with the result that there is now a
bunch of tickets that are "[with patch, needs review]". It would be
cool to get some of th
On May 6, 5:53 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the plan for getting Sage-4.0 out. Help in any way you can.
>
> Wed May 6: * mhansen (by 2am) -- patches/todo list so anybody can help.
> * robertwb will have reviewed david roe's
> * mabshoff provides bill with sy
17 matches
Mail list logo
