[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > > On Mar 30, 2009, at 19:34 , William Stein wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Justin C. Walker >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, all, >>> >>> On Mar 28, 2009, at 11:31 , mabshoff wrote: >>> this release is overdue, but here we g

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread mabshoff
On Mar 29, 2:17 am, davidloeffler wrote: Hi David, > I think I'm being credited with more than my fair share of reviewing > here: > > > #2551: Francis Clarke: __getitem__ for relative number field elements > > is ... surprising [Reviewed by John Cremona, David Loeffler] > > #5214: Francis Cla

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread Michael Abshoff
On Mar 30, 7:29 am, Ryan Hinton wrote: > Michael, > > I'm not entirely sure of the protocol for giving credit, but M.Albrecht > also helped with #5519 and #5535, and C.Witty looked over my patch for > #5535. > > Thanks! > > - Ryan Ok, when I understand you correctly the credits for those two p

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Mar 30, 2009, at 19:34 , William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Justin C. Walker > wrote: >> >> Hi, all, >> >> On Mar 28, 2009, at 11:31 , mabshoff wrote: >> >>> this release is overdue, but here we go. We have loads of little >>> fixes, but also >> >>> Sources as well a

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > Hi, all, > > On Mar 28, 2009, at 11:31 , mabshoff wrote: > >> this release is overdue, but here we go. We have loads of little >> fixes, but also > >> Sources as well as a sage.math only binary can be found in >> >>    http://sage.math.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread Justin C. Walker
Hi, all, On Mar 28, 2009, at 11:31 , mabshoff wrote: > this release is overdue, but here we go. We have loads of little > fixes, but also > Sources as well as a sage.math only binary can be found in > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/ I upgraded from 3.4.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread Ryan Hinton
Michael, I'm not entirely sure of the protocol for giving credit, but M.Albrecht also helped with #5519 and #5535, and C.Witty looked over my patch for #5535. Thanks! - Ryan mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > this release is overdue, but here we go. We have loads of little > fixes, but also

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:25 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > 2009/3/28 mabshoff : >> >> Hello folks, > > >> >> Sources as well as a sage.math only binary can be found in >> >>    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/ > > I have been unable to connect here all day. > > Jo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread John Cremona
thanks! John 2009/3/30 William Stein : > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:25 AM, John Cremona wrote: >> >> 2009/3/28 mabshoff : >>> >>> Hello folks, >> >> >>> >>> Sources as well as a sage.math only binary can be found in >>> >>>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:25 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > 2009/3/28 mabshoff : >> >> Hello folks, > > >> >> Sources as well as a sage.math only binary can be found in >> >>    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/ > > I have been unable to connect here all day. I don

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-30 Thread John Cremona
2009/3/28 mabshoff : > > Hello folks, > > Sources as well as a sage.math only binary can be found in > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/ I have been unable to connect here all day. John > > Please build, test and report any issues. > > Cheers, > > Michae

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-29 Thread davidloeffler
I think I'm being credited with more than my fair share of reviewing here: > #2551: Francis Clarke: __getitem__ for relative number field elements > is ... surprising [Reviewed by John Cremona, David Loeffler] > #5214: Francis Clarke: coercion to orders in relative number fields is > not implemen

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-28 Thread John Cremona
2009/3/28 mabshoff : > > Hello folks, > > this release is overdue, but here we go. We have loads of little > fixes, but also > >  * massive improvements to number fields (Francis Clarke) >  * Cython 0.11 (upstream Cython team including Robert Bradshaw) >  * rewrite fast_float to support more datat

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.alpha0 released

2009-03-28 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > this release is overdue, but here we go. We have loads of little > fixes, but also > > * massive improvements to number fields (Francis Clarke) > * Cython 0.11 (upstream Cython team including Robert Bradshaw) > * rewrite fast_float to support more datatypes