On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various
> places, so I rebuilt
> Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball was coorupted but it seems
> the download went okay.
>
> After the rebuild, the same
Hi,
I have made all known numerical noise issues with 3.2.a2 tickets - see
#4436-4439. If someone has some additional failures please add them to
the tickets. If you have a failure in another file please open a new
ticket against 3.2.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---
On Nov 3, 11:43 pm, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 4 Nov., 01:57, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> > sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> > this has been reported, but I just noticed that
On 4 Nov., 01:57, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> this has been reported, but I just noticed that there is
> "significant bit noise", not insignificant bit noise:
>
On Nov 3, 2008, at 5:01 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Nov 3, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
>> sage -t devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
>> See below
> Which matrix_group failure?
The one men
On Nov 3, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> > 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> > the way to the fin
On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> the way to the final 3.2. I plan to do another alpha3 in two days
> unless I run our of time in w
On here:
Linux version 2.6.16.60-0.31-smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2
20070115 (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Oct 7 16:16:29 UTC 2008
I get doctest failures in these:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx
On Nov 2, 5:06 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Look for lisp processes. I'm also using amd64 Ubuntu 8.10 and have had
> > big problems with lisp randomly hanging -- it doesn't crash, it just
> > sits doing nothing. This behavior is random but not very frequent. I
> > also see
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 at 05:43AM -0400, David Joyner wrote:
>> I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various
>> places, so I rebuilt
>> Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball was coorupted but it seems
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 at 05:43AM -0400, David Joyner wrote:
> I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various
> places, so I rebuilt
> Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball was coorupted but it seems
> the download went okay.
>
> After the rebuild, the same lockup occurs. T
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I am about to open tickets and post patches for all the numerical
> noise I have seen on x86, x86-64, Itanium and a G5.
>
On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel
I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various
places, so I rebuilt
Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball was coorupted but it seems
the download went okay.
After the rebuild, the same lockup occurs. This last time, it froze at
calculus.py.
When I ran sage -t --verbose
On Nov 1, 7:19 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 17:13 , mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> > 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> > the way to the fina
On Oct 31, 2008, at 17:13 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> the way to the final 3.2. I plan to do another alpha3 in two days
> unless I run our of time in wh
On the third pass of sage -testall, it appears that sage -testall is also
hanging on tut.tex, but when I reran the verbose option it passed fine.
On to pass #4
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:05 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that sage -testall is also hanging on
> devel/
It appears that sage -testall is also hanging on
devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py
but when I reran the verbose option it passed fine.
Again, this is on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:13 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 7:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It appears that the doc test is hanging on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
>> Is there something in sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
>> that is supposed t
On Nov 1, 7:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that the doc test is hanging on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
> Is there something in sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
> that is supposed to take a long time?
>
Nope, just kill the python process and rerun the test w
It appears that the doc test is hanging on amd64 ubuntu 8.10/intrepid ibex.
Is there something in sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
that is supposed to take a long time?
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:13 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should f
Two build reports for alpha2:
Successful build on my laptop (ubuntu 32-bit). THe only doctest
failures are in caclulus.py:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
**
File "/home/john/sage-3.2.alpha2/tmp/calculus.py", line
On Nov 1, 5:08 am, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Georg,
> Sage3.2.alpha2 built fine on my Intel Core2 Duo Mac OS X 10.4.11 /
> Xcode 2.5.
Good.
> Due most probably to the patch from trac ticket #788, several doctests
> throw numerical noise errors.
Yeah, that was to b
Hi,
Sage3.2.alpha2 built fine on my Intel Core2 Duo Mac OS X 10.4.11 /
Xcode 2.5.
Due most probably to the patch from trac ticket #788, several doctests
throw numerical noise errors.
Here are the first ones (doctesting is not complete yet):
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
**
On Oct 31, 7:23 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't mean to nit-pick but I didn't contribute to #2364 except to
> review.
Fixed. Some times with messy tickets like that one things get screwed
up. And I rather give too much credit than too little. But it is
always a good thing to p
I don't mean to nit-pick but I didn't contribute to #2364 except to
review.
-Marshall
On Oct 31, 7:13 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> th
25 matches
Mail list logo
