[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-23 Thread Michael.Abshoff
Andrzej Giniewicz wrote: > One test failed on standard rc1+clisp...p15, running 32 bit Arch linux > with GCC 4.3, /proc/cpuinfo below and doctest below it. > > cheers, > Andrzej. > > and only test that failed: > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/complex_double.pyx > ***

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
One test failed on standard rc1+clisp...p15, running 32 bit Arch linux with GCC 4.3, /proc/cpuinfo below and doctest below it. cheers, Andrzej. cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread John Cremona
On my 32-bit kubuntu machine all is well with rc1: All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 3933.1 seconds John 2008/4/21 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Apr 21, 11:14 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/4/21 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Both

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 21, 11:14 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/21 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >  Both of the failures you guys report -- in twist.py and testdoc.py involve > >  opening a network port, doing some tests that things are working, > >  then closing it. I think clos

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread Yi Qiang
Please keep reporting them. It should be the case that these tests pass on the first run. On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:14 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/4/21 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread John Cremona
2008/4/21 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > mabshoff wrote: > > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > here goes Sage 3.0.rc1. We are down to one blocker, i.e. the "-O0" > > > fallback for clips in case of

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mabshoff wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > here goes Sage 3.0.rc1. We are down to one blocker, i.e. the "-O0" > > fallback for clips in case of failure. Other than that this release > > should build and test fine.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread John Cremona
Built ok but one test fail on 64-bit Suse system The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py -- but passed when run by itself. Still building on 32 bit kubuntu. John 2008/4/21 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hello folks, > > here goes Sage 3.0.rc1

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.rc1 released!

2008-04-21 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > here goes Sage 3.0.rc1. We are down to one blocker, i.e. the "-O0" > fallback for clips in case of failure. Other than that this release > should build and test fine. The 3.0 release is imminent, so if you > find anything you better be quick. The plan is to f