On Apr 17, 7:47 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> > Mhh, can you remove the extra redirection in spkg-install and try
> > again.
Hi Kate.
> I still have a problem in clisp. To remind you this is 3.0.alpha5
> compiled with gcc-4.3.0.
How could I forget? ;)
> gcc -g -O2 -W -W
Michael,
> Mhh, can you remove the extra redirection in spkg-install and try
> again.
I still have a problem in clisp. To remind you this is 3.0.alpha5
compiled with gcc-4.3.0.
gcc -g -O2 -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-
type -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -
On Apr 17, 6:04 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
Hi Kate,
> Adding #include to
> givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/src/kernel/gmp++/gmp++.h
> worked.
Ok, I will patch Givaro And LinBox then to do so. IIRC I already
patched that in LinBox for gcc 4.3 once, but maybe I am mixing thin
Michael,
Adding #include to
givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/src/kernel/gmp++/gmp++.h
worked.
I also have had to add
#include
to libfplll-2.1.6-20071129.p2/src/src/main.cpp.
Now it has failed in clisp-2.41.p13 with
[1] + Suspended (tty input) make >& zzz1.4
Kate
On Apr 16, 5:19
On Apr 16, 9:22 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> When trying to build 3.0.alpha5 using gcc-4.3.0 on x86-Linux
> (pentium4-fc6), I get the following error in givaro
>
> make[5]: Entering directory `/home/kate/sage/sage-3.0.alpha5-x86-Linux/
> spkg/build/givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/
Michael,
When trying to build 3.0.alpha5 using gcc-4.3.0 on x86-Linux
(pentium4-fc6), I get the following error in givaro
make[5]: Entering directory `/home/kate/sage/sage-3.0.alpha5-x86-Linux/
spkg/build/givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/src/kernel/gmp++'
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=comp
All tests passed for me on Linux host-57-71 2.6.18.8-0.3-default #1
SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35 UTC 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux with
gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
John
2008/4/16 Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 04:18 , mabshoff wrote:
>
On Apr 15, 2008, at 04:18 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks
>
> here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was
> never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially
> considered
> potentially unstable, but that didn't happen. We have closed a total
> of *221* ticket
All tests passed on my intel mac pro (running 10.4.11).
-M. Hampton
On Apr 15, 4:04 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My alpha5 build report:
>
> (1) arch linux failure when building lapack; this is a known issue involving
> fortran. I'll try working around it... yep that gets pas
My alpha5 build report:
(1) arch linux failure when building lapack; this is a known issue involving
fortran. I'll try working around it... yep that gets past the lapack issue.
(2) 32-bit ubuntu, debian, 64-bit debian; sage.math: 100% good
(3) OS X 10.5 ppc:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/mod
Jaap Spies wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
>> Hello folks
>>
>> here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was
>> never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially
>> considered
>> potentially unstable, but that didn't happen. We have closed a total
>> of *221* tickets so
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was
> never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially
> considered
> potentially unstable, but that didn't happen. We have closed a total
> of *221* tickets so far. This alpha should bu
Installed and passed sage -testall on an intel macbook running os 10.4.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:18 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks
>
> here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was
> never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially
>
All tests pass on 64-bit RHEL (Opteron), and no more segfaults at exit
either.
Kiran
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was
> never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially
> considered
> potentially unstable, but that
14 matches
Mail list logo