[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.3.alpha1 released!

2008-06-07 Thread Michael Abshoff
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Dr. David Kirkby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jun 7, 3:12 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oops, pressed return by accident. > > > > This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day > > since I wanted to use it internally to te

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.3.alpha1 released!

2008-06-07 Thread David Joyner
Built fine and all tests passed (hardy heon amd64, phenom processor). On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oops, pressed return by accident. > > This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day > since I wanted to use it internally to test r

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.3.alpha1 released!

2008-06-07 Thread John Cremona
2008/6/7 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Oops, pressed return by accident. > > This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day > since I wanted to use it internally to test rebuild on some boxen. Due > to me chasing some other bugs and being busy in $REAL_LIFE alpha2 > didn't

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.3.alpha1 released!

2008-06-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On Jun 7, 3:12 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oops, pressed return by accident. > > This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day > since I wanted to use it internally to test rebuild on some boxen. Due > to me chasing some other bugs and being busy in $REAL_LIFE

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.3.alpha1 released!

2008-06-06 Thread mabshoff
Oops, pressed return by accident. This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day since I wanted to use it internally to test rebuild on some boxen. Due to me chasing some other bugs and being busy in $REAL_LIFE alpha2 didn't make it, i.e. the Cyclomic patch which I merged in