Michael,
This fixes the issue. Thanks!
Kate
On Jan 16, 11:22 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Jan 16, 5:08 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Michael,
>
> Hi Kate,
>
> > The patch for #1790 is ok, but after applying the patch for #1791
> > I now get
>
> I see th
On Jan 16, 5:08 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
Hi Kate,
> The patch for #1790 is ok, but after applying the patch for #1791
> I now get
I see that I missed one single digit being different. Please try
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/1790/Sage-2.10.alpha3
Michael,
The patch for #1790 is ok, but after applying the patch for #1791
I now get
./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/
polynomial_element.pyx*
On Jan 15, 10:54 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One error in testing (see below):
>
> On Jan 15, 2008, at 12:05 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Sage 10.2.alpha3 is out. The combinatorics update has been
> > sorted out and doctests should pass. There were also a
> > whole bunch of
On Jan 15, 10:32 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
Hi Kate,
> sage-2.10.alpha3 fails one test (polynomial_element.pyx) on
> both
> x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6)
> x86_64-Linux (Opteron-fc6)
>
> Both were built using gcc-4.2.2
>
> Details follow.
>
> Kate
>
> **
> x86-Linux
> **
One error in testing (see below):
On Jan 15, 2008, at 12:05 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> Sage 10.2.alpha3 is out. The combinatorics update has been
> sorted out and doctests should pass. There were also a
> whole bunch of small updates. The big push for alpha4 [at
> least on my end] will be the package
Michael,
sage-2.10.alpha3 fails one test (polynomial_element.pyx) on
both
x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6)
x86_64-Linux (Opteron-fc6)
Both were built using gcc-4.2.2
Details follow.
Kate
**
x86-Linux
**
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/
polynomial_element.pyx***
mabshoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sage 10.2.alpha3 is out. The combinatorics update has been
> sorted out and doctests should pass. There were also a
> whole bunch of small updates. The big push for alpha4 [at
> least on my end] will be the package update and the merging
> of the 64 bit MacIntel fixes.
>
