First we need to upgrade our IPython to 0.12! Is anyone working on it?
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 7:25:10 AM UTC+8, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> personally, i'm a fan of IPython's parallelization framework. Maybe it
> would be best to ext
personally, i'm a fan of IPython's parallelization framework. Maybe it
would be best to extend their existing framework? this would benefit sage
directly because ipython is included. implementing higher-level interfaces
directly into sage will come handy later.
H
--
To post to this group, sen
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:44:39PM -0800, akm wrote:
> > I'm interested. But in the practical application I've in mind, the data
> > isn't
> > there it is generated on the fly by sage itself. The problem it to gather
> > information (eg: the size) on huge sets from combinatorics. Th
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:52:38PM -0800, akm wrote:
> > I'm interested. But in the practical application I've in mind, the data
> > isn't
> > there it is generated on the fly by sage itself. The problem it to gather
> > information (eg: the size) on huge sets from combinatorics. Those sets are
>
> In any case the streaming utility seems quit like what would be good for
> Sage. What do I have to do to take a file with, say, a lot of random
> numbers and then use a Sage script to compute the square of each? Can you
> give me a brief description?
Here's a way to perform that task using sage
I had look at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/PythonWordCount . I might have
misconcluded that using Jython means that you have to use it. It was marked
as a Python example, making me think it was a generic one.
In any case the streaming utility seems quit like what would be good for
Sage. What d
> From having a short glance at the webpage I see that you use jpython. I
> doubt that Sage builds with it, so I wonder whether this can become a
> problem or not.
Which webpage are you looking at? I haven't thought much yet about
how to implement this integration, but there are some options.
Ha
> I'm interested. But in the practical application I've in mind, the data isn't
> there it is generated on the fly by sage itself. The problem it to gather
> information (eg: the size) on huge sets from combinatorics. Those sets are
> generated by a choice tree. The exploration of the various branc
Hi Andrew,
I would be interested as well. It seems like a fabously efficient way of
distributing jobs.
>From having a short glance at the webpage I see that you use jpython. I
doubt that Sage builds with it, so I wonder whether this can become a
problem or not.
Best, Martin
--
To post to th
