[sage-devel] Re: Sage (not fan mail) Fwd: used sage

2008-05-15 Thread David Joyner
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David, your wording implies that there was one leak. Robert Miller and I sat > down for an hour a day every day for about 2 weeks, and fixed a number of > leaks every time. We eventually lost steam, because we didn't make an > a

[sage-devel] Re: Sage (not fan mail) Fwd: used sage

2008-05-15 Thread boothby
David, your wording implies that there was one leak. Robert Miller and I sat down for an hour a day every day for about 2 weeks, and fixed a number of leaks every time. We eventually lost steam, because we didn't make an appreciable dent in the number of memory leaks. Rather than 'leak', Leo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage (not fan mail) Fwd: used sage

2008-05-15 Thread David Joyner
Agreed. It is too slow. Guava now (very recently) has C code which computes min dist very fast for binary and ternary codes (codes from graphs are binary, so this would apply). However, it has not yet been linked to in SAGE. Why? There was a period when Michael said that the Leon code was leaking