On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> It seems that in Sage 4.0.1.rc0, there is an error when I tried
>> building the PDF version of the reference manual. If you're
>> interested, the complete LaTeX log is here:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/doc/reference.lo
On 4 Jul 2009, at 23:21, Robert Miller wrote:
> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
> htt
Hi,
> It seems that in Sage 4.0.1.rc0, there is an error when I tried
> building the PDF version of the reference manual. If you're
> interested, the complete LaTeX log is here:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/doc/reference.log
>
> I think this should be fixed before releasing the
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
>>
>> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar
On Jul 6, 11:03 am, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:20 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> > It builds for me; the other two spkgs there (3.1.0-4-...) fail to
> > build on my mac.
>
> can you maybe provide full log there of both 3.1.0-2 and 3.1.0-4? Best
> as packed download
Hi,
we're a atep further with regard to the OS X / Singular 3.1.0.4
problem; see my comments at
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6362#comment:29.
There does seem to remain one more issue, but let's see.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:20 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> It builds for me; the other two spkgs there (3.1.0-4-...) fail to
> build on my mac.
can you maybe provide full log there of both 3.1.0-2 and 3.1.0-4? Best
as packed download to not make mail of all full... anyway I can
imagine there m
On Jul 6, 4:03 am, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:25 AM, gsw wrote:
>
> > On Mac OS X 10.4, too, singular fails to build (see the message from
> > John H Palmieri above).
>
> > It seems that (see trac #6362) the update from Singular 3.1.0.2 to
> > Singular 3.1.0.4 did
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:25 AM, gsw wrote:
>
> On Mac OS X 10.4, too, singular fails to build (see the message from
> John H Palmieri above).
>
> It seems that (see trac #6362) the update from Singular 3.1.0.2 to
> Singular 3.1.0.4 did have an unwanted side-effect ... thoughts?
seems so, in
On a beta Ubuntu 9.10, sage-4.1.rc0 built and tested fine.
However, Jaap Spie's ETS install doesn't work for vtk-
cvs-20090316.spkg.
Its looking for a libpython2.5.a and a Python.h file. Sage of course
has a
Python.h in its python2.6 directories, but it seems that vtk is
looking for
a 2.5. In
On Mac OS X 10.4, too, singular fails to build (see the message from
John H Palmieri above).
It seems that (see trac #6362) the update from Singular 3.1.0.2 to
Singular 3.1.0.4 did have an unwanted side-effect ... thoughts?
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To pos
I also built and tested (on Arch Linux current, 32bit, that's gcc 4.4
snapshot) - one test failed, devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph.py - in
exactly same way as for Jaap (output noise)
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Robert Miller wrote:
>> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and
On Jul 5, 1:22 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
> On Fedora 9, 32 bit:
>
> --
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph.py"
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph.py"
>
On 4 Jul 2009, at 23:21, Robert Miller wrote:
> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
> htt
On Jul 4, 8:21 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tarhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage...http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmil
On an amd64 ubuntu 9.04 machine, install built fine and all tests passed.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
> http://sage.math.was
Robert Miller wrote:
> Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
> http://sage.math.washington.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
> merged the following:
>
> #6429 [with patch; positive review] sagedoc: make search_src and
> friends less OS dependent
> #6258 [with patch, positive review] Improve accuracy of graph
> eigenvalues
> #6196 [with patch, positive revie
20 matches
Mail list logo
