[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-22 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 22, 10:17 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Brandon > Speaking of Matlab, I was able to get version r2008a (most recent > version) working in a linux-2.6 zone using the CentOS 5 distribution. > I then installed RPyC 3.00 RC1 (http://rpyc.wikispaces.com/) Interesting,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speaking of Matlab, I was able to get version r2008a (most recent version) working in a linux-2.6 zone using the CentOS 5 distribution. I then installed RPyC 3.00 RC1 ( http://rpyc.wikispaces.com/ ) in both the lx zone's copy of sage and in the native solaris sage installation. I started up the R

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 16, 1:33 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15 Jul, 23:48, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > According to ls -l, the file is 139557984 bytes long. Here's the > > > checksum: Hi David, > > > $  dig

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-16 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 15 Jul, 23:48, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > According to ls -l, the file is 139557984 bytes long. Here's the > > checksum: > > > $ digest -v -a md5 sage-3.0.5-sse3-i86pc--SunOS_BETA.tar.gz > > > md5 (sage-3.0.5-sse3-i86

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 15, 11:18 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice work! > > Haven't been able to try it yet, the download link seems to be dead > for me as well, though the server is alive according to ping. Odd, I just checked and http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/relea

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice work! Haven't been able to try it yet, the download link seems to be dead for me as well, though the server is alive according to ping. On Jul 15, 6:48 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On 14 Jul, 23:25, mabsh

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14 Jul, 23:25, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello folks, Hi, > > since Sage on Solaris is more than a little tricky to build at the > > moment I packaged up a 3.0.5 build at > > >    http://sage.math.washington

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 14 Jul, 23:25, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello folks, > > since Sage on Solaris is more than a little tricky to build at the > moment I packaged up a 3.0.5 build at > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.5/sa... > > Notice that it still has some se

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 14 Jul, 23:25, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello folks, > > since Sage on Solaris is more than a little tricky to build at the > moment I packaged up a 3.0.5 build at > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.5/sa... > > Notice that it still has some se

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 15, 8:30 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 15, 7:29 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > Hi Vincent Sorry for the noise, I hit send by accident before rereading the email and I need to correct some things: > > Tried to answer earlier, but for

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 15, 7:29 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi Vincent > Tried to answer earlier, but for some reason my answer didn't go > through ... Yeah, some times Google groups is a little funny in that regard. > Anyway, if it's not too much trouble to you, I am greatly >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Tried to answer earlier, but for some reason my answer didn't go through ... Anyway, if it's not too much trouble to you, I am greatly interested in a solaris9-sparc version, and I'm sure I'm not the only one (even though potentially interested people might not subscribe to this particular l