Hello, Ralf!
Ralf Hemmecke writes:
>> For the reasons Robert Bradshaw mentioned, I don't think the AutoTools
>> SEP makes a lot of sense for Sage.
>
> Robert also added
>
> "Automake would add another level of complexity to the build process, in
> particular one which is not understood by many
Hi Bill,
What you may be seeing is Valgrind not being able to detect the memory
aliasing you're using in that complex loop condition ((i <
test_mpn_poly->limbs) && (result == 1)). If you can re-create this
exact error using a similar snipet of code in a tiny example program,
it would be worth se
Sure, that's precisely what I think the error means. I'm just saying I
have code where I don't see anything like this, but valgrind still
reports the error.
The code is quite complex I'm probably just missing something
somewhere. I mean here is essentially the part which causes the error:
result
On Aug 20, 2007, at 2:07 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>> However, there is one "error" which valgrind reports on my own code
>> from time to time which I have been unable to determine the source
>> of.
>> It says something like "conditional jump depends on uninitialised
>> data". I have stared at code
On Aug 20, 8:10 pm, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Getting rid of memory leaks also speeds up code dramatically as I
> found out recently. When new memory is allocated by the kernel, it
> isn't quite ready to be used. As you begin writing to it, pages of
> roughly 4kb at a time initiate
Getting rid of memory leaks also speeds up code dramatically as I
found out recently. When new memory is allocated by the kernel, it
isn't quite ready to be used. As you begin writing to it, pages of
roughly 4kb at a time initiate an interrupt which the kernel has to
deal with, called a minor page
David: Thanks so much! I'm using it as a starting point. I took the
liberty of adding a SEP section to the wiki, with this as the first
SEP. I'm currently going through and trying to make it as specific as
possible.
As this is pretty significant undertaking, I think that it will end up
being quit
Bobby: Here is a very rough draft - a starting point at least. - David
SEP
Authors - Bobby Moretti, David Joyner
Preamble -- Functions for calculus
Abstract -- A Python class structure is needed to provide SAGE with
the ability to do calculus calculations. Easy of use of the syntax
is a top p
On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:30:28 -0800, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On 12/7/06, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Could somebody v
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:30:28 -0800, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Could somebody volunteer to write up a "SAGE Enhancement Proposal"
>> > for Calculus
On 12/7/06, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could somebody volunteer to write up a "SAGE Enhancement Proposal"
> > for Calculus functions based on all the discussion on this list
> > during the last 48 hours? A
On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody volunteer to write up a "SAGE Enhancement Proposal"
> for Calculus functions based on all the discussion on this list
> during the last 48 hours? Alex? Bobby? David? Joel?
>
> William
I'd be glad to.
--
Bobby
12 matches
Mail list logo
