Re: [sage-devel] Re: SAGE_ATLAS_LIB and sage -bdist

2013-06-11 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 11/06/2013 23:54, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit : I'll have a look at the ARM ATLAS issue later, I'm sure we can manage to get something working! Sebastien Villemot got something going further yesterday on the debian atlas 3.10.1 package ; I still have to run ptestlong on it to check for corr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SAGE_ATLAS_LIB and sage -bdist

2013-06-11 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:41:20 PM UTC+2, Snark wrote: > > Le 11/06/2013 15:34, leif a �crit : > > Well, if you want the libraries to be part of the bdist (i.e., ship > > them), why don't you just copy them into the Sage tree before running > > 'sage -bdist'? > > I think that's what I'll

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SAGE_ATLAS_LIB and sage -bdist

2013-06-11 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 11/06/2013 15:34, leif a écrit : Well, if you want the libraries to be part of the bdist (i.e., ship them), why don't you just copy them into the Sage tree before running 'sage -bdist'? I think that's what I'll do... or there will be no more ARM bdist :-( -- You received this message becaus

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE_ATLAS_LIB and sage -bdist

2013-06-11 Thread leif
Julien Puydt wrote: Le 11/06/2013 11:33, Volker Braun a écrit : I'd say archiving the symlink is exactly what you'd want. If you use system libraries for compiling Sage then they become dependencies of the binary distribution, obviously. What would break if they were copied instead of linked?