Hi everybody.
I see this discussion is getting less focus in this moment.
I am fine with this, I see people has a lot of stuff to do. At the
same time, would you please consider updating the open ticket on SAGE:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3852
I think this would make at least th
Darren Dale wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw <
> rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
Maurizio wrote:
> Not yet... I think I was previously asking whether so
People,
I'm really glad about having brought this discussion to a reasonably
interesting level.
>From now on, I can't give any other comment (I can't deal with code so
specific issues), but I'd like to hear those coming from the
mantainers of SAGE.
As far as I'm concerned, I was trying to get the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>>> Maurizio wrote:
>>>
Not yet... I think I was previously asking whether some of you guys
are inter
On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Maurizio wrote:
>>> Not yet... I think I was previously asking whether some of you guys
>>> are interested in trying to contact them, if you do think it does
>>> makes sense.
>>
>>> I mean, if this commu
On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > Not yet... I think I was previously asking whether some of you guys
> > are interested in trying to contact them, if you do think it does
> > makes sense.
>
> > I mean, if this community is interested in having this feature, the
> > Qu
Maurizio wrote:
> Not yet... I think I was previously asking whether some of you guys
> are interested in trying to contact them, if you do think it does
> makes sense.
>
> I mean, if this community is interested in having this feature, the
> Quantities developers are going to find some good feed
Not yet... I think I was previously asking whether some of you guys
are interested in trying to contact them, if you do think it does
makes sense.
I mean, if this community is interested in having this feature, the
Quantities developers are going to find some good feedback, otherwise,
we could ju
Maurizio wrote:
> Hi
>
> can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
> compatible with SAGE? I don't know how SAGE modifies the way to
> represent numbers, and why it does not comply with Quantities.
Have you asked the Quantities developers to look at this thread? My
gue
Maurizio wrote:
> Hi
>
> can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
> compatible with SAGE? I don't know how SAGE modifies the way to
> represent numbers, and why it does not comply with Quantities.
>
> For example, how does SAGE generate an instance of
> "sage.rings.integ
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Maurizio wrote:
> For example, how does SAGE generate an instance of
> "sage.rings.integer.Integer"? I hope this can help me.
Well, I can at least answer this question. When you type at the sage:
prompt, or in the notebook, the input is run through the "preparse
Thank you for your help.
I realize now how silly it has been to ask such a general question
here, with you guys just guessing. Even this not being the solution,
this has still been helpful for me to understand something more.
Hopefully, I'll get more into it.
By the way, any other comment about
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
> compatible with SAGE? I don't know how SAGE modifies the way to
> represent numbers, and why it does not comply with Quantities.
>
> For example, how does SAGE generate
Hi
can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
compatible with SAGE? I don't know how SAGE modifies the way to
represent numbers, and why it does not comply with Quantities.
For example, how does SAGE generate an instance of
"sage.rings.integer.Integer"? I hope this can hel
On Mar 14, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> It sounds like the problems is the known issue that numpy does not
> interact very well with Sage data types. Try this:
>
> from numpy import *
> import quantities as pq
> res = 10r*pq.ohm
>
> The 10r means to create a python integer, rather than
In fact my idea is a bit different, and I'll explain in a minute:
provided that the system is SI, you should get the result as a
multiplier (bigger than one) of the closest classic unit
representation
ex: meters -> nm - um - mm - m - km - ecc ecc
ex:
x1 = 10cm
x2 = 1m
x1 + x2 = 1.1m
y1 = 1V (Vol
Maurizio wrote:
> Regarding the output of such expression you wrote, I agree that it
> should give a standard unit output for each physical quantity, so by
> presetting SI (or imperial, or anything else), it should give just
> meters (or feets, or anything else)...
I'm pretty sure that would cau
Maurizio wrote:
> Hi Fergus,
>
> thank you for your comments!
> So, do you consider working on a Quantity porting worthwhile? It seems
> that you got some good experience by working on it, so you can
> probably give some better advice about the structure of that package.
>
> Moreover, I'm wonder
Hi Fergus,
thank you for your comments!
So, do you consider working on a Quantity porting worthwhile? It seems
that you got some good experience by working on it, so you can
probably give some better advice about the structure of that package.
Moreover, I'm wondering how much work would it requi
Hi,
Thanks for emailing me Nicolas.
I had a quick play with writing a units extension really just to learn
more about SAGE. I've only just started writing this so its still a
way off being ready for prime time but so far you can create
quantities with units, manipulate them like any other number
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 06:48:16PM -0700, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
> >
> > Maurizio wrote:
> >> With this, I'm not proposing this package over others (for example,
> >> Unum looks very mature, but outdated), I'm just asking if one of you
> >> ca
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> Ok, let me add another long post to this conversation... hopefully you
> have enough patience!! This is probably known stuff for some of you,
> but I'm sure some others will learn something! I kindly ask you to try
> to go through all this pos
Ok, let me add another long post to this conversation... hopefully you
have enough patience!! This is probably known stuff for some of you,
but I'm sure some others will learn something! I kindly ask you to try
to go through all this post, I think it will be worthwile.
Short and not so important
Thank you Jason, I'll try it as soon as possible.
By the way, have you got any idea about where in the code should I
look at to let it work with SAGE numbers? Something like constructors
or stuff like that?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 15 Mar, 02:29, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > To be hones
Does he keep track of his experiment somewhere on the net? I would
like to have a look at it.
By the way, this effort is certainly good, but one of the biggest
merit of SAGE was (in my modest opinion) the idea to not reinvent the
wheel as long as it's possible. (I hope SAGE is not changing its pa
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Maurizio wrote:
>> With this, I'm not proposing this package over others (for example,
>> Unum looks very mature, but outdated), I'm just asking if one of you
>> can spend some minutes to review our trac ticket about units of
>> measurement
Maurizio wrote:
> To be honest, I'd have thought that installing a python package and
> let it work with SAGE would have been easier, but one issue could be
> that I've been working on this in a Saturday night (after coming back
> home) from midnight to 1.30 am!! :)
>
> I summarize the way I got
To be honest, I'd have thought that installing a python package and
let it work with SAGE would have been easier, but one issue could be
that I've been working on this in a Saturday night (after coming back
home) from midnight to 1.30 am!! :)
I summarize the way I got "quantities" (http://pypi.py
Maurizio wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm forwarding this to sage-devel as well, maybe being the most
> appropriate group to address this issue.
>
> I'm a happy user of SAGE, and I won't stop thanking all you guys for
> this wonderful job! Although, I also try to encourage you in getting
> something better
29 matches
Mail list logo
