[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-22 Thread Jason Grout
Carl Witty wrote: > On Jan 21, 1:31 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > dortmund.de> wrote: >> On Jan 21, 5:44 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> mabshoff wrote: >>> For now, we could have some custom queries that look for "patch" in the >>> title of an issue to somewhat narrow down the lis

[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-22 Thread Carl Witty
On Jan 21, 1:31 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 21, 5:44 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> mabshoff wrote: > > For now, we could have some custom queries that look for "patch" in the > > title of an issue to somewhat narrow down the list, right? > > Anybody w

[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-21 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 21, 5:44 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > > On Jan 20, 7:33 am, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and just searched for "patch" to create this list. There is no point > > in creating another milestone for ticket with patches only. We used to >

[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-21 Thread Jason Grout
mabshoff wrote: > > > On Jan 20, 7:33 am, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 19-Jan-08, at 10:31 PM, Nick Alexander wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 19-Jan-08, at 7:46 PM, mabshoff wrote: Hello folks, Sage 2.10.1.alpha0 is on the way and merging has gone well. But there i

[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-19 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 20, 7:33 am, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19-Jan-08, at 10:31 PM, Nick Alexander wrote: > > > > > > > On 19-Jan-08, at 7:46 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > >> Hello folks, > > >> Sage 2.10.1.alpha0 is on the way and merging has gone well. But > >> there is a boat-load of patches

[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-19 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 20, 7:31 am, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19-Jan-08, at 7:46 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > > > > Hello folks, > > > Sage 2.10.1.alpha0 is on the way and merging has gone well. But > > there is a boat-load of patches (about 55) that need reviews to > > get merged. So if you hav

[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-19 Thread Nick Alexander
On 19-Jan-08, at 10:31 PM, Nick Alexander wrote: > > > On 19-Jan-08, at 7:46 PM, mabshoff wrote: > >> >> Hello folks, >> >> Sage 2.10.1.alpha0 is on the way and merging has gone well. But >> there is a boat-load of patches (about 55) that need reviews to >> get merged. So if you have a little ti

[sage-devel] Re: Request for review: Sage 2.10.1.alpha cycle

2008-01-19 Thread Nick Alexander
On 19-Jan-08, at 7:46 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Sage 2.10.1.alpha0 is on the way and merging has gone well. But > there is a boat-load of patches (about 55) that need reviews to > get merged. So if you have a little time come on over to trac > or #sage-devel and help out :) > > Ch