[sage-devel] Re: Remaining Mercurial patches

2013-12-26 Thread Keshav Kini
maldun writes: > And I have another question: why github? afaik bitbucket would allow > to use both git and mercurial. So it is possible for users to submit > a mercurial patch on a git repo and vice versa. I think this would > avoid a lot of compability issues. I've never heard of such a featur

[sage-devel] Re: Remaining Mercurial patches

2013-12-18 Thread maldun
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:01:47 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:34:31 PM UTC, maldun wrote: >> >> And I have another question: why github? >> > > We only use github to mirror our own repo to save bandwidth. All > development is done with our own git serve

[sage-devel] Re: Remaining Mercurial patches

2013-12-17 Thread Volker Braun
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:34:31 PM UTC, maldun wrote: > > And I have another question: why github? > We only use github to mirror our own repo to save bandwidth. All development is done with our own git server. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

[sage-devel] Re: Remaining Mercurial patches

2013-12-17 Thread maldun
or better for the client: hg-git (http://hg-git.github.io/) On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:26:23 PM UTC+1, maldun wrote: > > Why not use git-hg? https://github.com/cosmin/git-hg > > On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:51:27 AM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> I would recommend people change their mer

[sage-devel] Re: Remaining Mercurial patches

2013-12-17 Thread maldun
And I have another question: why github? afaik bitbucket would allow to use both git and mercurial. So it is possible for users to submit a mercurial patch on a git repo and vice versa. I think this would avoid a lot of compability issues. I peronally prefer git, but I guess there are a lot of p

[sage-devel] Re: Remaining Mercurial patches

2013-12-17 Thread maldun
Why not use git-hg? https://github.com/cosmin/git-hg On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:51:27 AM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > I would recommend people change their mercurial patches to git branches, > even only if to get their feet wet with git and the "sage -dev" scripts. > But I will merge merc

[sage-devel] Re: Remaining Mercurial patches

2013-12-16 Thread Volker Braun
I would recommend people change their mercurial patches to git branches, even only if to get their feet wet with git and the "sage -dev" scripts. But I will merge mercurial tickets, too. For now it is still possible to use mercurial & sage-5.13 to develop, but as time passes this will become le