William Stein wrote:
> Robert:
>> I think using [] to specify lists is clean and pythonic. We are
>> basically extending the grammar
>> list_display ::=
>> "[" [listmaker] "]"
>
> Yep. It make sense. It's possibly not even completely unreasonable
> that this notation could eventua
On 9/19/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am going to wait a while to see what brews up, even though
> > the majority vote was against [a..b].
> >
> > At a minimum I would like to implement that for the preparser (or
> > have somebody else do so), and see what it feels like to us
I've created a trac ticket.
http://www.sagemath.org:9002/sage_trac/ticket/702
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> On 19-Sep-07, at 8:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sep 19, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 19-Sep-07, at 8:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I am rather fond of the '..' operator, though I can see why people
>>> wouldn't want to add it as an official part of sage. Th
On 19-Sep-07, at 11:48 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On 19-Sep-07, at 8:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I am rather fond of the '..' operator, though I can see why people
>>> wouldn't want to add it as an official part of sage.
On 19-Sep-07, at 8:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am rather fond of the '..' operator, though I can see why people
>> wouldn't want to add it as an official part of sage. This got me to
>
> I think the decision about whether or not
On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am rather fond of the '..' operator, though I can see why people
> wouldn't want to add it as an official part of sage. This got me to
I think the decision about whether or not to include something like
this is definitely not decided y
