Of course. I agree that there should be an algorithm parameter, but I
bet most people/functions will end up using the default which should
be something reasonable.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 8:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
> I want to add that however random's are changed, e.g., for the
> integers,
I want to add that however random's are changed, e.g., for the integers,
the current behavior MUST still be available. The reason is because most
benchmarks I know about for other systems use uniformly chosen random
numbers in an interval. Loosing this behavior would make it much much
more painf
