Did you do that on a linux machine, or on OS X with X11 running?
Because it seemed to me that the r.png device required X11.
On Jan 24, 1:38 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 9:24 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > OK I think I have learned a little.
On Jan 24, 2008 9:24 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK I think I have learned a little. The following code seems to flush
> the output properly, and sends it to the current cell.
>
> r.postscript(os.curdir+'/out.ps')
> r.par(ann=0)
> values = [x for x in srange(0,float(pi),.1)]
> r.p
OK I think I have learned a little. The following code seems to flush
the output properly, and sends it to the current cell.
r.postscript(os.curdir+'/out.ps')
r.par(ann=0)
values = [x for x in srange(0,float(pi),.1)]
r.plot(values, [sin(x) for x in values], type='lines')
r.dev_off()
On Jan 24,
If you are starting from scratch, that may be true. But there are
many, many stats folks out there with code, lectures, textbooks, etc.
written for R. The vast majority will not switch to something else
unless there is some back-compatability.
-Marshall Hampton
On May 3, 12:51 pm, Nick Alexand
My favorite feature of R is that it has very robust data-fitting routines.
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Although I don't use it myself, I think that incorporating R will be a
>> huge boost to SAGE, and so I have been trying t
Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Although I don't use it myself, I think that incorporating R will be a
> huge boost to SAGE, and so I have been trying to get R and rpy working
> on OS X.
I don't doubt that incorporating R would be nice, but AFAICT the
advantage to using R is its
