On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Jan 30, 1:35 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> On Jan 29, 8:46 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> > it shows, by the way, that idea to use set() (or Set()) to remedy
>> > differences in docstrings with
>> > the output of randomised procedures
On Jan 29, 8:46 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> it shows, by the way, that idea to use set() (or Set()) to remedy
> differences in docstrings with
> the output of randomised procedures, discussed
> here:http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1f688f...
> does not really fly.
Ho
it shows, by the way, that idea to use set() (or Set()) to remedy
differences in docstrings with
the output of randomised procedures, discussed
here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1f688f25bdd5dab2
does not really fly.
On Jan 30, 10:38 am, kcrisman wrote:
> On #7
