I see, thanks for the clear explanation, indeed "100" * a is absurd.
Still, should there at least be some mechanism to handle `int` in this
code path? Since the path for `_mul_` works:
```
sage: class Number(Parent):
: def __init__(self, x): self.x = x
: def __repr__(self): ret
On Monday 12 February 2024 at 03:21:36 UTC-8 Gareth Ma wrote:
sage: class Number:
: def __init__(self, x): self.x = x
: def __repr__(self): return f"Number({self.x})"
: def _acted_upon_(self, other, _): return Number(self.x *
ZZ(other))
I think that would have horrible
