>
> I vote for 1j being the Python complex number. This is because the only
> people I can ever imagine using the notation "j" in Sage are numerical
> numpy-type users who would be very annoyed to get Sage complex numbers
> ever.
Actually, at least Electric/Electronic Engineering doesn't use i
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Python supports creating complex numbers using the following syntax:
>
> imagnumber ::= (floatnumber | intpart) ("j" | "J")
>
> Right now, the preparser botches this and makes it give an error:
>
> sage: 1j
> -
