On 9/9/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simpy is indeed an interesting package and could be useful in a future
> for rewriting the
> calculus package (replacing maxima)
>
> However. rather than incorporating it into Sage as a package, I feel
> that we will need to take some of it
> As an intermediate version of what you suggest, in
> cases where sympy is much slower, e.g., number of partitions,
> we can patch sympy at import time to use our version of that
> function (in Python that sort of thing is very easy -- you can replace
> any object or file-scope function in any Py
On 9/9/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simpy is indeed an interesting package and could be useful in a future
> for rewriting the
> calculus package (replacing maxima)
>
> However. rather than incorporating it into Sage as a package, I feel
> that we will need to take some of it c
Simpy is indeed an interesting package and could be useful in a future
for rewriting the
calculus package (replacing maxima)
However. rather than incorporating it into Sage as a package, I feel
that we will need to take some of it code and re-write it to fit well
into Sage.
This is because, Sage
> So far, from everything I've seen I think sympy + whatever
> we already do in SAGE is the best way forward for
> pure symbolic manipulation in SAGE.
>
> I'll include the latest version of sympy (version 0.5.3) in
> sage-2.8.4.1 so people can take a look at it. See
>
>http://code.google.com/
On 9/8/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The idea of incorporating Ginac into Sage was discussed some time ago
> > in this list.
> > Now I see that in its page there is a link to some python bindings for Ginac
> >
> > http://pyginac.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > This could be useful for
One more comment:
I see that this project is not actively maintained, in fact in its
e-mail list the last e-mail is from 2005...
On 9/8/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea of incorporating Ginac into Sage was discussed some time ago
> in this list.
> Now I see that in its pa
> The idea of incorporating Ginac into Sage was discussed some time ago
> in this list.
> Now I see that in its page there is a link to some python bindings for Ginac
>
> http://pyginac.sourceforge.net/
>
> This could be useful for us, however they use boost rather than cython/pyrex
You can also
