As a first step I have made a new ticket for an improved spkg, which
has "make check" test set in the makefile. If that looks OK I will
try to get it merged upstream.
So I would appreciate it if anyone can review #5018:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5018.
Marshall
On Jan 18, 11:22
2009/1/18 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2:36 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> > This obviously leads to the joke about the professor being asked what
>> > his favorite programming language is and the answer being "PhD" :)
>>
>> I believe that is actually a *true* story, the prof in que
On Jan 18, 8:43 am, mhampton wrote:
> On Jan 17, 8:44 pm, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Marshall,
> > If you look at the Makefile of this code you should clearly see that
> > it needs cleaning up and rewriting it from scratch in this case might
> > be easier since only a couple files are involved. On p
On Jan 18, 2:36 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
Hi John,
> > This obviously leads to the joke about the professor being asked what
> > his favorite programming language is and the answer being "PhD" :)
>
> I believe that is actually a *true* story, the prof in question being
> (Professor Sir Peter)
On Jan 17, 8:44 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> If you look at the Makefile of this code you should clearly see that
> it needs cleaning up and rewriting it from scratch in this case might
> be easier since only a couple files are involved. On problem right off
> the bat is that compiler as well as build
On Jan 18, 6:34 am, mhampton wrote:
> On Jan 17, 8:57 pm, William Stein wrote:
Hi Marshall,
> > I don't think there should even be a vote until you sign off on the
> > platform support. Getting new packages into sage involves two
> > things: (1) a list of minimum requirements about code q
On Jan 17, 8:57 pm, William Stein wrote:
> I don't think there should even be a vote until you sign off on the
> platform support. Getting new packages into sage involves two
> things: (1) a list of minimum requirements about code quality and
> portability, and (2) sufficient interest and s
> This obviously leads to the joke about the professor being asked what
> his favorite programming language is and the answer being "PhD" :)
I believe that is actually a *true* story, the prof in question being
(Professor Sir Peter) Swinnerton-Dyer. He was asked what programming
language he used
On Jan 17, 6:57 pm, William Stein wrote:
> > And lrs can be build as a library and probably will so be integrated
> > in Sage in the future. Since there are issues with LLP64 this is not a
> > fun thing to debug, i.e. anything that can go wrong will lead to a
> > segfault which isn't fun to
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:44 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 17, 12:56 pm, mhampton wrote:
>> On Jan 17, 8:36 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> > But the code certainly needs prettying up, i.e. I couldn't find a test
>> > suite, the files were all dumped in the same directory and on and on.
>
On Jan 17, 12:56 pm, mhampton wrote:
> On Jan 17, 8:36 am, mabshoff wrote:
Hi,
> > But the code certainly needs prettying up, i.e. I couldn't find a test
> > suite, the files were all dumped in the same directory and on and on.
> > If upstream is interested I could certainly make some sugges
I would be glad to have standard functions for triangulations!
Andrey
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, vis
On Jan 17, 8:36 am, mabshoff wrote:
> But the code certainly needs prettying up, i.e. I couldn't find a test
> suite, the files were all dumped in the same directory and on and on.
> If upstream is interested I could certainly make some suggestions.
I don't think for such a small program that t
On Jan 17, 6:17 am, mhampton wrote:
Hi,
> I would like a vote on including the lrs optional package as a
> standard package in Sage.
>
> lrs stands for linear reverse search, an algorithm for computing
> convex hulls which is quite different from that of cddlib (which is
> already in Sage).
14 matches
Mail list logo
