[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-16 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2009/9/16 Minh Nguyen : > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jason Grout > wrote: > > > >> I think networkx 0.99 will require some nontrivial work in Sage, since >> they changed a lot of things. I forgot to say about another package, but at least for now, they don't "cascade" on several othe

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > I think networkx 0.99 will require some nontrivial work in Sage, since > they changed a lot of things. NetworkX 1.0 should be out soon under the BSD license. Previous versions were under LGPL. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen --~--~-

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Grout
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > 2009/9/15 Jason Grout : > >>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py" >>> ** >>> File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py", line 155: >>> sage: g = graphs.Pe

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2009/9/15 Jason Grout : >> sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py" >> ** >> File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py", line 155: >>     sage: g = graphs.PetersenGraph() >> Expected nothing >> Got: >>  

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Grout
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > 2009/9/15 kcrisman : As for you for now, you'd need to change the eigenvectors() command in the matrix code. If you wanted to do so and submit a patch, it would be greatly appreciated! >> But all doctests pass for me in alpha1: >> >> ./sage -

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2009/9/15 kcrisman : > >> > As for you for now, you'd need to change the eigenvectors() command in >> > the matrix code.  If you wanted to do so and submit a patch, it would be >> > greatly appreciated! >> > > But all doctests pass for me in alpha1: > > ./sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/" > All te

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Grout
kcrisman wrote: > >> For some reason SR eigenvectors were never actually tested, I think - >> because they inherit directly from matrix2.pyx! In fact, the error >> comes from eigenspaces_left in that file, where G = self.fcp() calls >> degree of a symbolic expression, which now requires an argum

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread kcrisman
> For some reason SR eigenvectors were never actually tested, I think - > because they inherit directly from matrix2.pyx!  In fact, the error > comes from eigenspaces_left in that file, where G = self.fcp() calls > degree of a symbolic expression, which now requires an argument ! The > symbolic u

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread kcrisman
Also see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6165. On Sep 15, 9:28 am, kcrisman wrote: > > > As for you for now, you'd need to change the eigenvectors() command in > > > the matrix code.  If you wanted to do so and submit a patch, it would be > > > greatly appreciated! > > But all doctests

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread kcrisman
> > As for you for now, you'd need to change the eigenvectors() command in > > the matrix code.  If you wanted to do so and submit a patch, it would be > > greatly appreciated! > But all doctests pass for me in alpha1: ./sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/" All tests passed! Total time for all test

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-15 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jason Grout wrote: > Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >> Do you have any idea as to what would be the proper way to correct >> this issue? Preferably without needing to use an older maxima for the >> sage package :-) > > This change was actually motived by a request from the Sage project

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread Jason Grout
kcrisman wrote: > > > On Sep 14, 6:51 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the >>> maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's >>> maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread kcrisman
On Sep 14, 6:51 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the > > maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's > > maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because w

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2009/9/14 Jason Grout : > > Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >>   Hi, >> >>   In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the >> maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's >> maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when reaching the >> cell:

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with different maxima versions

2009-09-14 Thread Jason Grout
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the > maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's > maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when reaching the > cell: > > A.eigenvectors() > > maxim