On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Peter
Jeremy wrote:
> On 2009-Jun-25 09:09:02 +0200, William Stein wrote:
>>The main problems with building Sage on BSD, in my experience, are
>>that (1) you have to "gmake" instead of "make" to run the GNU version
>>of Make, which is a pain,
>
> My approach to t
On 2009-Jun-25 09:09:02 +0200, William Stein wrote:
>The main problems with building Sage on BSD, in my experience, are
>that (1) you have to "gmake" instead of "make" to run the GNU version
>of Make, which is a pain,
My approach to this was to symlink gmake to $SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/make
since the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:17 AM, wrote:
> On 2009-Jun-24 00:56:38 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>>Would it not be sensible to ask around on some FreeBSD/NetBSD mailing
>>lists etc, and see if one could drum up enough support to start a port?
>
> I've done some work on getting Sage to work
On 2009-Jun-24 00:56:38 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>Would it not be sensible to ask around on some FreeBSD/NetBSD mailing
>lists etc, and see if one could drum up enough support to start a port?
I've done some work on getting Sage to work on FreeBSD but there is
still a way to go. For va
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Robert
Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
>>
>> From the top README.txt
>>
>> ---
>> NOT SUPPORTED:
>> * FreeBSD
>> * Arch Linux
>> * Gentoo Linux
>>
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> From the top README.txt
>
> ---
> NOT SUPPORTED:
> * FreeBSD
> * Arch Linux
> * Gentoo Linux
> * Microsoft Windows (via Visual Studio C++)
> * Microsoft Wind
