Dear Guillaume,
On Nov 23, 2:33 am, Guillaume Moroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool: I modified this python script, ran some tests and now the
> singular interface is well used for fraction field coefficients :D.
Good!
If I remember correctly, long-time ago I did something into that
direction,
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Guillaume Moroz wrote:
> Youps, there was a little problem in my patch for the univariate
> fraction field case. This patch replaces the previous one.
Hi there,
the patch looks good! We've got two options now.
Either one of the Sage developers takes care of the patch
Youps, there was a little problem in my patch for the univariate
fraction field case. This patch replaces the previous one.
Guillaume
229c229,236
<
---
>
> elif sage.rings.fraction_field.is_FractionField(self.base_ring()) and
> (self.base_ring().base_ring() is ZZ or
> self.base_ring().ba
Hi,
On Nov 22, 8:10 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> if you want to give it a try have a look at
>
>sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_singular_interface.py
Cool: I modified this python script, ran some tests and now the
singular interface is well used for fraction field coeffi
On Saturday 22 November 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmm I asked the same question a while ago. Seems it wasn't noticed
> then:)
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/3ab2e924e5
>d887f7/ddeae645aced582f?lnk=gst&q=michel#ddeae645aced582f
Hi,
if you want to give
Hmm I asked the same question a while ago. Seems it wasn't noticed
then:)
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/3ab2e924e5d887f7/ddeae645aced582f?lnk=gst&q=michel#ddeae645aced582f
Regards,
Michel
On Nov 22, 1:01 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > ri
> > ring R=(0,a,b),(x,y),dp;
> >
> > (following the syntax 2. given
> > athttp://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/latest/sing_30.htm#SEC40)
> >
> > In particular, Gröbner basis can be computed by Singular in these
> > polynomial rings more efficiently than the toy algorithm currently
> > used.
> This
On Nov 21, 6:10 pm, Guillaume Moroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I'm new to sage, and so far I like it!
>
:)
> Just my two cents here: it seems that the sage interface to singular
> is not aware that Singular handles multivariate polynomial rings with
> coefficients in a fraction f
