On Dec 5, 2007 1:36 AM, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But anyway, I think we can put the issue about PolyBoRi taking too
> long to build at rest. :)
OK, put to rest.
And off-list Michael Brickenstein sent me some applications of PolyBoRi to
a paper I wrote in grad school 11
On Dec 5, 2007, at 02:01 , Michael Brickenstein wrote:
>
> There is no policy. Fee free to do so :-).
Please, no! Don't cross-post.
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
---
I'm beginning to like the cut of his jibberish.
--
There is no policy. Fee free to do so :-).
On 5 Dez., 10:59, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
darmstadt.de> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 19:57 , Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>
>
> > Note that this is for comments and testing only, and is not at all
> > complete. I know one way of crashing it, tr
On Dec 4, 2007, at 19:57 , Burcin Erocal wrote:
Note that this is for comments and testing only, and is not at all
complete. I know one way of crashing it, try to use BooleSet
iterators.
I just built it and will do some preliminary testing today! Thanks for
your work!
Comments, suggest
On Dec 4, 2007, at 20:11 , William Stein wrote:
>
>>> Hey, it failed for me :-) on ubuntu 32-bit linux:
>>
>> I removed the pushd and popd, apparently they are bashisms.
>>
>> Here is the new package:
>>
>> http://www.risc.uni-linz.ac.at/people/berocal/sage/polybori-0.1-r4.spkg
>
> I've update
Hi everybody,
build succeeds on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5148 @ 2.33GHz running SLES
10 64Bit (SuSE 10.1 + full patches)
[...]
scons: done building targets.
Done installing PolyBoRi.
real3m32.929s
user2m49.039s
sys 0m17.821s
Successfully installed polybori-0.1-r4
Best regards,
Ale
> > Hey, it failed for me :-) on ubuntu 32-bit linux:
>
> I removed the pushd and popd, apparently they are bashisms.
>
> Here is the new package:
>
> http://www.risc.uni-linz.ac.at/people/berocal/sage/polybori-0.1-r4.spkg
I've updated the package on sagemath.org; I then did
install_package('
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:43:44 +0100
Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Could Burcin post a link to his patch bundle that provides library
> > > support for PolyBoRi for Sage in this thread, so we can all try
> > > it out?
>
> OK, until I update to 2.8.15, merge the changes into my rep
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:40:52 -0800
"William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 8:35 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > William Stein wrote:
> > > Regarding PolyBoRi, (1) it is now an optional package (I just
> > > added it to the optional package list). It woul
On 4-Dec-07, at 8:43 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:30:39 -0800 (PST)
> mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> Could Burcin post a link to his patch bundle that provides library
>>> support for PolyBoRi for Sage in this thread, so we can all try
>>> it out?
Worked for
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:30:39 -0800 (PST)
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could Burcin post a link to his patch bundle that provides library
> > support for PolyBoRi for Sage in this thread, so we can all try
> > it out?
>
> Yep, that should happen ASAP.
OK, until I update to 2.8.15, mer
On Dec 4, 2007 8:35 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > Regarding PolyBoRi, (1) it is now an optional package (I just added
> > it to the optional package list). It would be good if everybody
> > reading this with interest in polybori and some cycles to s
William Stein wrote:
>
> Regarding PolyBoRi, (1) it is now an optional package (I just added
> it to the optional package list). It would be good if everybody
> reading this with interest in polybori and some cycles to spare
> could type
> sage: install_package('polybori-0.1-r3')
> and rep
On Dec 4, 4:58 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 6:54 AM, mabshoff
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 4, 3:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
>
> > > Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Dec 4, 2007 6:54 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 3:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface
On Dec 4, 3:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
>
> Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface) can be
> > built in about 3 minutes on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5148 @ 2
Hello,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface) can be
> built in about 3 minutes on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5148 @ 2.33GHz
> (using one cpu only). I'll try to find the corresponding scons
>
Hello again,
The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface) can be
built in about 3 minutes on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5148 @ 2.33GHz
(using one cpu only). I'll try to find the corresponding scons
commands for the spkg and the Sage-wrapper and give to to Burcin.
Best regards,
Alexa
Hi anybody,
> it might be true that more users care about R but what if a minority really
> really pushes for PolyBoRi? ;-)
>
> In any case, I am BCC'ing this to Michael and Andreas maybe they have some
> wisdom to share how to cut the compile time of PolyBoRi.
Hm, is this really a problem? From
19 matches
Mail list logo
