[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-29 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
Ok, so probably a little late (seem to be closed), and I'm supper not used to track, so I'll comment here. Looking at code in http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=2fc399e25960514a3164080f800d867696480c49 TEMPLATE_PATH could technically be a list of path, as IPython uses Jinja filesystem

[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-16 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
Hey, sorry for the time to respond, I'm not subscribed to the list and did actually forgot hopefully I have todo list :-). I'll dig on how to do it on 2.x but I'm pretty certain it should be doable. Le lundi 6 octobre 2014 19:50:48 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > It was my understanding that

[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-06 Thread Volker Braun
It was my understanding that selectively extending the templates requires >=3.0, but if you can point me in the right direction for doing on 2.2 then I'd be happy to. On Monday, October 6, 2014 5:32:03 PM UTC+1, Matthias Bussonnier wrote: > > Hey, > > (response following ping of William on IPy

[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-06 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
Hey, (response following ping of William on IPython ML) Looks nice I haven't looked at everything from your modifications, but I would say that it should be possible to selectively extend the templates to avoid the copy/past which should remove roughly 400 lines and some maintenance burden.

[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-06 Thread Volker Braun
anybody? On Monday, September 29, 2014 12:48:55 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > Now would be a good time to review the IPython notebook: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16996 > > There is clearly more to be done to make the integration perfect, and we > could also always wait for the next