[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage?

2020-05-10 Thread Timo Kaufmann
As far as I'm aware, everyone's current solution to packaging sage is to more or less completely ignore its own build system and do everything manually in whatever specification format your package manager uses. You will need to make sure it keeps working once the dependencies change. The test

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging SAGE for (re)distribution in RPM form

2008-01-16 Thread David Joyner
On Jan 15, 2008 11:50 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 16, 5:23 am, gri6507 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've posted several thread on this topic now - mostly with question. > > But now, with the help of several members in this forum, I finally > > have my first release of

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging SAGE for (re)distribution in RPM form

2008-01-16 Thread gri6507
Thank you for the reply. I redistributed the .hg folders into the devel package. As for your warning, I completely understand the origin of the concern. I, along with the rest of the packaging community at PCLinuxOS, will have to wrestle with this one later. --~--~-~--~~~--

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging SAGE for (re)distribution in RPM form

2008-01-15 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 16, 5:23 am, gri6507 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've posted several thread on this topic now - mostly with question. > But now, with the help of several members in this forum, I finally > have my first release of an RPM > (seehttp://www.mypclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?topic=1509.msg133

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging SAGE for (re)distribution in RPM form

2008-01-15 Thread mabshoff
gri6507 wrote: Hi, > I've posted several thread on this topic now - mostly with question. > But now, with the help of several members in this forum, I finally > have my first release of an RPM (see > http://www.mypclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?topic=1509.msg13310#msg13310) > > I now want to do tw

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-22 Thread William Stein
On 7/19/07, Georges Khaznadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William Stein a écrit : > > (1) Create a monolothic .deb, which installs everything SAGE currently > > distributes in /opt/sage/, along with a run script /usr/bin/sage. > > This stage is OK : the debian package was built finely, but it is

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
> Building SAGE on Linux/ARM at all is likely a major project. SAGE is quite > large and probably nobody has every compiled some of the key components > on Linux/ARM before. Because many of those components are very tightly coded > C (and sometimes assembly) mathematics libraries, there could be

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Abshoff
Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hello, >> >> current stable release on a whim, so I think getting Sage into Ubuntu >> is >> >> a >> >> much more reachable goal. It also seems that Ubuntu is getting a lot >> >> more >> >> mindshare in the *desktop* these days (compared to Debian unstable). >> >> I meant D

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread William Stein
On 7/17/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, Debian supports a lot more architectures and from what I know it is > > discouraged to limit the architecture due to non-technical reasons. Sage > > is widely used on Linux and x86, x86-64 and to some extend on PPC and > > Itanic, but

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
> >> current stable release on a whim, so I think getting Sage into Ubuntu is > >> a > >> much more reachable goal. It also seems that Ubuntu is getting a lot > >> more > >> mindshare in the *desktop* these days (compared to Debian unstable). > > I meant Debian *stable* in the end, not *unstable*

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Abshoff
Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> While solution (1) is against the "Debian Way" (2) is next to impossible >> from a debugging standpoint, i.e. which version of libSingular, g++ and >> clisp are you using? I don't think anybody intends to get Sage into the >> official Debian distribution because maintaini

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
> While solution (1) is against the "Debian Way" (2) is next to impossible > from a debugging standpoint, i.e. which version of libSingular, g++ and > clisp are you using? I don't think anybody intends to get Sage into the > official Debian distribution because maintaining a stable branch release

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Abshoff
William Stein wrote: > > On 7/17/07, Georges Khaznadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, I would like to make a Debian package of Sage. >> >> I recently attended a talk of Professor Tsai who uses it in Taiwan, and >> it was pretty convincing. >> >> Apparently, Sage depends on other software whi

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-17 Thread William Stein
On 7/17/07, Georges Khaznadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, I would like to make a Debian package of Sage. > > I recently attended a talk of Professor Tsai who uses it in Taiwan, and > it was pretty convincing. > > Apparently, Sage depends on other software which should be packaged > separat